Identifying the Electrophile in But-2-ene and Bromine Reaction

AI Thread Summary
In the reaction of but-2-ene with bromine and concentrated aqueous sodium nitrate, the correct statement is that the mechanism involves an initial electrophilic attack followed by a nucleophilic attack. The electrophile is identified as NO2+, which is formed under specific conditions, despite concerns about its generation from sodium nitrate. The resultant compound exhibits optical activity due to the formation of a chiral center, but the compound's trigonal planar structure allows for attack from both sides, leading to a racemic mixture. The discussion clarifies that 2,3-dibromobutane is not the only product, as other configurations can occur. Ultimately, the consensus is that the mechanism is complex and involves both electrophilic and nucleophilic components.
chewchun
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


But-2-ene reacts with bromine in the presence of concentrated aqueous sodium nitrate to give the following compound
CH3-C(H)(ONO2)-C(H)(Br)-CH3

Which of the following statement is correct.
a.the electrophile is NO2+
b.Only 2,3-dibromobutane is formed.
c.Resultant solution shows optical activity.
d.Mechanism involves an initial electrophilic attack followed by nucleophilic attack

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that B is out cause you can have -Br and -OH instead of just 2-Br.
C is also out because the compound can be attacked from both side(Trigonal planar)
A or D is correct.D makes sense to me but isn't NO2+ a electrophile. In this case i would presume NO2+ is somehow formed which attacks OH group...If not what is the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See, the halide molecule also polarize and form halide electrophile, in this case, Br+ can form. NaNO3 cannot give NO2+ ion, as it is obtained by "protonation" of nitric acid, which is not a simple task, considering nitric acid itself is very strong acid. That's what I feel.
 
Name these ions... NO3- and NO2+

Which one is present in your proposed mixture?
 
CH3-C(H)(ONO2)-C(H)(Br)-CH3

Care to elaborate, as chemisttree asked?

UPDATE: I have formed on paper the compound H3C-CH(ONO2)-CHBr-CH3, considering Nitrate group, albeit I am afraid I may have have bent some rules (which looks like the case, forming acid out of aqueous nitrate ions) And I have reached to following answers: C, D.
 
Last edited:
AGNuke said:
CH3-C(H)(ONO2)-C(H)(Br)-CH3

Care to elaborate, as chemisttree asked?

UPDATE: I have formed on paper the compound H3C-CH(ONO2)-CHBr-CH3, considering Nitrate group, albeit I am afraid I may have have bent some rules (which looks like the case, forming acid out of aqueous nitrate ions) And I have reached to following answers: C, D.

The answer was given to be D only.
The carbon is directly bonded to oxygen,and the oxygen directly bonded to NO2.So it seems to be O- and NO2+?And i presume the O- to be created from a alcohol group and the H+ is removed...
Answer is not C as the compound is trigonal planar and can be attacked from both sides,hence a racemic mixture..
But i don't understand how C(O)(NO2) is formed as it seems impossible to form NO2+ from this reaction...
 
Esterification I guess.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top