If acceleration is stated is terms of velocity....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of acceleration expressed in terms of velocity or position, specifically questioning the implications of relationships like a = v. Participants explore how to convert these relationships into time and the dimensional consistency of such equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to clarify the dimensional inconsistencies of the equation a = v and suggest it may be more accurately represented as a = kv. Others discuss the integral-differential relationships and the process of solving differential equations related to acceleration and velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the dimensional analysis and differential equations. There is an exploration of different interpretations of the relationships and attempts to reconcile various approaches to the problem, though no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for boundary conditions to solve for arbitrary constants in the equations discussed. There is also mention of the challenge in finding appropriate values for these constants based on the provided equations.

k_squared
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is not a particular problem but a generic one. If one has acceleration stated in terms of velocity (or position) such as a=v, how do we convert these values into time?

Homework Equations


ads=vdv
ad(theta)=wdw

And of course, the usual time-based derivative relations for acceleration, velocity and positions.

The Attempt at a Solution


Sorry, guys, this one is killing me right now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
k_squared said:
such as a=v
First of all, this cannot be the relationship as it is dimensionally inconsistent.

Second, what you have is just a differential equation that you need to solve.
 
k_squared said:
such as a=v
You can use the integral-differential relationship between the two quantities. Also, a=v is dimensionally incorrect. The equation could be a=kv, where k has the unit of time-1.
 
Allright, clarified question... let's saw we have $$\alpha=50\sqrt{\omega}$$. This is, I believe, equivalent to the diffyQ $$y''=50\sqrt{y'}$$. The book solves the equation by taking from $$dw/dt=a $$ $$ dt=dw/a$$, and integrating with bounds that are suggested by the problem. Wolframalpha solves the problem by giving $$y=\frac{625t^3}{3}+c_1^2+25c_1t^2+c_2$$

So my real question is.. how do I reconcile these two, or am I wrong about something? (I can't find appropriate values of the constants of integration in the case of the last equation!)
 
In that case, ##y## is ##\theta## and the rest is the same, although I think Wolfram Alpha must have had a factor of ##t## on the ##c_1^2##, did it not?

Since ##\alpha = d\omega / dt##, you can rewrite the first equation as:

$$\frac{d\omega}{ dt} = 50\sqrt{\omega}$$

And then through separation of variables:

$$\frac{d\omega}{50\sqrt{\omega}} = dt$$

Then integrate both sides:

$$\frac{1}{50}\int\frac{d\omega}{\sqrt{\omega}} = \int dt$$

$$\frac{1}{25}\sqrt{\omega} = t + c_1$$

$$\omega= 625t^2 + 1250c_1t + 625c_1^2$$

Note that if we roll a factor of 25 into ##c_1##, this becomes:

$$\omega= 625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2$$

This is ok to do because the constants are arbitrary. And since ##\omega = d\theta / dt##, you can repeat the process:

$$\frac{d\theta}{dt} = 625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2$$

$$d\theta = (625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2) dt$$

$$\int d\theta = \int (625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2) dt$$

$$\theta = \frac{625}{3}t^3 + 25c_1t^2 + c_1^2 t + c_2$$

As for the boundary conditions, you can redo the above using the boundary conditions as the limits of integration. Or, you can use the above equation to plug the values for ##y## and ##t## that you are given, and solve for the arbitrary constants. You'll need two conditions to solve for both constants.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
814
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
24
Views
2K