If I is open interval, prove I is an open set

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Set
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Is this a good-enough proof? I could have used neighborhoods to show this, but it seems like this way is a bit easier.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110911_113143.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have really only changed the problem from showing that one set is open to showing that two are closed; you'll need to use neighborhoods either way. Much simpler to just take x \in (a,b) (assuming a < b) and take r to be the minimum of b-x and x-a so that x - r >= x - (x-a) = a and x + r <= x + (b-x) = b. Then (x-r, x+r) \subset (a,b) holds so that x is an interior point of (a,b).
 
gauss^2 said:
You have really only changed the problem from showing that one set is open to showing that two are closed; you'll need to use neighborhoods either way. Much simpler to just take x \in (a,b) (assuming a < b), take r to be the minimum of b-x and x-a so that x - r >= x - (x-a) = a and x + r <= x + (b-x) = b. Then (x-r, x+r) \subset (a,b) holds so that x is an interior point of (a,b).

Well, I also used the fact that if one set is open, its complement is closed. I suppose that's not enough, though.

The professor suggested the method you just did.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top