IF I want to research breeder reactors, do I go for NucEng or Nuclear Physics?

AI Thread Summary
For researching breeder reactors, pursuing a degree in nuclear engineering is recommended over nuclear physics. While nuclear physicists focus on subatomic particles, nuclear engineers address the practical challenges of reactor design and performance. Breeder reactors have been built but have faced significant engineering hurdles that require further understanding and innovation. The theoretical aspects of breeder reactors are well established, but the engineering solutions are more complex. Engaging with specific literature and online resources is essential for gaining insights into this field.
zheng89120
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
title
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
zheng89120 said:
title
If you want to research you should start reading the specific literature.
 
zheng89120 said:
title

Hope you don't mean me. I know the theory but have no direct experience with breeders. And from my understanding the ones that have been built have not been all that successful. There do seem to be a lot of resources online so start there.
 
NUCENG said:
Hope you don't mean me. I know the theory but have no direct experience with breeders. And from my understanding the ones that have been built have not been all that successful. There do seem to be a lot of resources online so start there.
If so, here.
Unlike me many people here can answer on your questions regarding fission reactors.
I think that some of them are experts in this field.
 
I would recommend you study nuclear engineering.

Most nuclear physicists study the nucleus and other subatomic particles like quarks Some nuclear physicists are more applied science and work on nuclear reactors, but you won't find many.

There has been a lot of experience with breeder reactors. I am sure there are several things that need more understanding. Yet, they are a lot of engineering problems to increase the performance of breeders.
 
Last edited:
The nuclear physics of breeder reactors is well understood.

The engineering aspects are more challenging. Study nuclear engineering if one wishes to do research concerning breeder reactors. Look at courses in reactor physics (neutron transport theory), materials science, mechanics of materials, fluid mechanics/dynamics, corrosion, . . .
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top