If in Ring, evaluate (a+b)(c+d)

  • Thread starter Thread starter apalmer3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the expression (a+b)(c+d) where a, b, c, and d are elements of a ring. The context suggests a focus on properties of rings in abstract algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of a straightforward application of the distributive property, with some expressing doubt about the simplicity of the answer. Questions arise regarding the implications of being in a ring versus a field, and the nature of the elements involved.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the properties of rings, particularly regarding the distributive property and the commutativity of addition. Some participants have provided insights on the ordering of operations and the implications of ring definitions, but no consensus has been reached on the evaluation method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of additional information about the elements a, b, c, and d, which may influence the evaluation. The discussion also touches on the distinction between commutative and non-commutative rings.

apalmer3
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a,b,c,d [tex]\in[/tex] R, evaluate (a+b)(c+d). (R is a ring.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think that it's simple foiling, but I'm not sure.
ac+ad+bc+bd
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you suspect this not to be true?

If you're in doubt re-check the definition of a ring.
 
Last edited:
I doubt it simply because I'm in a 4000 level Math course. It can't be this easy an answer.
 
What else could it be?
 
Well, if there's no more information about a,b,c,d than I don't know what else you could do :smile:
 
Okay, so I'm going to guess that everyone agrees with me that this is right? It just seems too easy! Oh well, I'll accept it and move on. :-D
 
Treat (a+d) as one element and use the distributive property of rings. Then use it again. Make sure you keep the ordering if you're not dealing with a commutative ring.
 
Okay, that makes sense, PingPong! So, technically, the order is different.

(a+b)(c+d)
=> (a+b)c+(a+b)d
=> ac+bc+ad+bd
 
Right, but remember that in a ring, addition is commutative, so your order doesn't matter. What I said about ordering was meant to be applied to multiplication (unless you're dealing with a commutative ring). So what you had at the beginning was correct, but now you see why!

EDIT: Actually as a side note, commutativity of addition in a ring is an unneeded axiom, because it follows from the distributive property. If you treat (c+d) as one element, the distributivity property gives (a+b)(c+d)=a(c+d)+b(c+d)=ac+ad+bc+bd. This means that ac+bc+ad+bd (your method) is equivalent to ac+ad+bc+bd, or ad+bc=bc+ad. Thus addition is commutative.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K