jobyts
- 226
- 60
If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian. -Paul McCartney
would you become one?
would you become one?
jobyts said:If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian. -Paul McCartney
Ivan Seeking said:Due to blood sugar and other problems, I need a diet high in protein, and I can't eat nuts. I probably couldn't survive as a vegetarian.
Greg Bernhardt said:Can't drink whey protein shakes?
jobyts said:If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian. -Paul McCartney
would you become one?
rootX said:Yes. I don't know how some people love to eat half alive fishes .. etc
rootX2332803 said:Yes. I don't know how some people love to eat half alive fishes .. etc
Ivan Seeking said:Hmmmm, never tried one as far as I know, but you can't live on milkshakes.
jobyts said:If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian. -Paul McCartney
would you become one?
Thats the point, there is a difference between farm reared and slaughtered beef from the Yorkshire Dales and factory chicken.Pythagorean said:That's a fallacy. I think the more proper statement would be that people would stop buying their meat from certain slaughterhouses.
texasblitzem said:I did this for three months after the surgery, and ate only baked chicken and bananas. I still drink at least one protein shake a day. I went from 320lbs to 170lbs. :shy:
jobyts said:If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian. -Paul McCartney
would you become one?
negitron said:That's a ridiculous statement from several angles. For one thing, most people have never been anywhere near a slaughterhouse. For another, a non-insignificant segment of the population hunts, dresses and butchers their own meat. And some people don't suffer under the illusion that meat comes from the supermarket; I've seen what goes on in a slaughterhouse and you have my red meat when you can pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Paul McCartney is a great songwriter but a lousy sociologist.
negitron said:That's a ridiculous statement from several angles. For one thing, most people have never been anywhere near a slaughterhouse. For another, a non-insignificant segment of the population hunts, dresses and butchers their own meat. And some people don't suffer under the illusion that meat comes from the supermarket; I've seen what goes on in a slaughterhouse and you have my red meat when you can pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Paul McCartney is a great songwriter but a lousy sociologist.
negitron said:That's a ridiculous statement from several angles. For one thing, most people have never been anywhere near a slaughterhouse. For another, a non-insignificant segment of the population hunts, dresses and butchers their own meat. And some people don't suffer under the illusion that meat comes from the supermarket; I've seen what goes on in a slaughterhouse and you have my red meat when you can pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Paul McCartney is a great songwriter but a lousy sociologist.
Monique said:Do you know how the animals enter the slaughterhouse? I think that issue is much more important than the slaughtering after the animal is dead.
jobyts said:If one feels absolutely no difference between watching cutting a plant and killing a mammal (both for food), I would say he/she's either not normal, or unintentionally lying to justify ones meat eating philosophy.
negitron said:Seeing a pet killed makes me sad. Seeing my dinner killed makes me hungry.
I actually read or heard (I forget which) that human teeth cannot handle raw vegetables, fruits, etc. over an entire life because our teeth are too soft. They'd get worn down. It kind of makes me wonder about what PETA says about vegetarianism and how it's natural, but that's a different story.Kronos5253 said:I have molars and incisors and canines for a reason. Humans are not herbivores.. If we were we'd have teeth entirely like a cow or a horse.
Moonbear said:Why? If it's killing for food and not just some form of entertainment, why would you have any more emotion about one than the other? It's just something you do because you have to do it. I don't know where society has come up with this silly idea that we are supposed to feel guilty about our food source. It's rather counter-productive to survival if we get emotionally attached to our dinner. It may be anthropomorphic, but I really doubt that lions or coyotes get all worked up inside about having to kill their own dinner either.
Only for people who have been coddled all their lives, and who think hamburg comes in plastic trays with plastic wrap. Shooting a deer is the anticlimax of the hunt, but I feel much better providing a humane death to a wild creature to provide meat for my family than buying beef from cattle who have been confined and fattened in feed-lots.jobyts said:My point is whether it's for food or not, seeing a mammal or a bird being killed is an unpleasant one.
turbo-1 said:Only for people who have been coddled all their lives, and who think hamburg comes in plastic trays with plastic wrap. Shooting a deer is the anticlimax of the hunt, but I feel much better providing a humane death to a wild creature to provide meat for my family than buying beef from cattle who have been confined and fattened in feed-lots.
turbo-1 said:Only for people who have been coddled all their lives, and who think hamburg comes in plastic trays with plastic wrap.
TheStatutoryApe said:I grew up in the city and have pretty much spent my whole life there. I'm not sure I could kill most things though I am pretty sure I wouldn't have any trouble fishing and cleaning fish. Of course if my neighbour will do the deer hunting and slaughtering I'll do the fishing.
turbo-1 said:Only for people who have been coddled all their lives, and who think hamburg comes in plastic trays with plastic wrap. Shooting a deer is the anticlimax of the hunt, but I feel much better providing a humane death to a wild creature to provide meat for my family than buying beef from cattle who have been confined and fattened in feed-lots.
I was brought up in a family that expected children to participate in the slaughter of poultry and livestock. We were encouraged to attend the birth of cattle and watch the hatching of chicks, too, and we were expected to lend a hand as they were turned into the food that we would eat. Many people have a disconnect about this kind of thing, and act morally superior when they decide that they won't eat meat. Ever notice that so often these "superior" beings carry leather handbags, wear expensive leather shoes and leather belts?
I remember the first time that I was considered old enough and reliable enough to carry wash-basins of pig's blood from the barn to the kitchen so that my mother, aunts, great-aunts, etc could start making blood sausage. Little kids could be allowed to carry large and small intestines to the kitchen because after all, if you dropped them in the dirt, they would simply be washed off, and were destined to be thoroughly cleaned out and boiled anyway to make sausage casings. Spill a wash-pan of blood in the driveway, and the wrath of the (female) elders would fall heavily on you.
And what exactly is your point? I don't get it. My question still stands: Do you know how the animals enter the slaughterhouse?Kurdt said:It depends where you come from on how the animals are treated Monique.
I don't agree, at one point in evolution we relied on meat for our evolutionary advantage. Our society evolved much since then. Today you can get by perfectly fine without ever eating meat even once in your life. I know people who have been vegetarian from birth and there is nothing wrong with them.Kronos5253 said:Nope, I'd still eat meat. I have molars and incisors and canines for a reason. Humans are not herbivores.. If we were we'd have teeth entirely like a cow or a horse.
The human body requires the nutrients that meat provides. Why would I deny my body the nutrients it needs? It's been doing humanity pretty good for thousands and thousands of years, and I honestly don't think any more people would be vegetarians because of a glass slaughter house than people would be if they still had to kill their food themselves.
1950's. My uncles were still twitching timber out of the woods using horses, and farming and raising livestock using methods that had been around forever.Werg22 said:Did you grow up in the 18th century or what?![]()
Monique said:And what exactly is your point? I don't get it. My question still stands: Do you know how the animals enter the slaughterhouse?
Monique said:I don't agree, at one point in evolution we relied on meat for our evolutionary advantage. We've evolved much since then. Today you can get by perfectly fine without ever eating meat even once in your life. I know people who have been vegetarian from birth and there is nothing wrong with them.
jobyts said:Does any animal eat carnivorous animals?
lisab said:Sure, lots of them. Coyotes will eat cats, for example.