Ignoring the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics

In summary, the conversation discusses the consideration of acceleration in thermodynamics problems involving a piston. The reasoning behind assuming no acceleration is questioned, with a suggestion to consider a massless frictionless piston. The conversation also delves into the force balance on the piston and the work done by the gas and piston on each other. The addition of piston friction is also briefly mentioned, with a reference to a more detailed discussion on the subject. The complexity of analyzing the system at a point before equilibrium is reached is acknowledged, and it is confirmed that the work done by the piston and gas on each other is equal and opposite due to Newton's 3rd law.
  • #1
etotheipi
I was just reading a set of thermodynamics lecture notes and came across the following

1575743091926.png


In most thermodynamics problems I have done, it is indeed assumed that the piston does not accelerate so we can simply equate forces on the piston. However, I don't fully understand the line of reasoning given above.

For instance, if the pressure of the gas inside a frictionless piston far exceeds that of the external gas, surely it would be detrimental to ignore the acceleration?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
etotheipi said:
I was just reading a set of thermodynamics lecture notes and came across the following

View attachment 253810

In most thermodynamics problems I have done, it is indeed assumed that the piston does not accelerate so we can simply equate forces on the piston. However, I don't fully understand the line of reasoning given above.

For instance, if the pressure of the gas inside a frictionless piston far exceeds that of the external gas, surely it would be detrimental to ignore the acceleration?
I think it makes more sense to consider the case of a massless frictionless piston, in which case the forces acting on the two opposing faces are equal to one another. In any event, even if the piston has mass, if the system is in equilibrium at the final state, all the kinetic energy imparted to the piston during the process is recovered in the end when the piston is no longer moving.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #3
If we do a force balance on the piston, we obtain:
$$F_g-P_{ext}A=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$where ##F_g## is the force exerted by the gas on the piston. If we multiply this equation by the piston velocity v and integrate, we obtain the mechanical energy balance on the piston:$$W_g-\int{P_{ext}dV}=KE=m_{piston}\frac{v^2}{2}$$In the final state of the system, when the piston has reached its equilibrium position, its velocity and kinetic energy are zero. Therefore, for the final equilibrium state, $$W_g=\int{P_{ext}dV}$$and the work done by the gas on its surroundings is just the volume integral of the external force.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
  • #4
Chestermiller said:
If we do a force balance on the piston, we obtain:
$$F_g-P_{ext}A=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$where ##F_g## is the force exerted by the gas on the piston. If we multiply this equation by the piston velocity v and integrate, we obtain the mechanical energy balance on the piston:$$W_g-\int{P_{ext}dV}=KE=m_{piston}\frac{v^2}{2}$$In the final state of the system, when the piston has reached its equilibrium position, its velocity and kinetic energy are zero. Therefore, for the final equilibrium state, $$W_g=\int{P_{ext}dV}$$and the work done by the gas on its surroundings is just the volume integral of the external force.

Thank you, this is really useful. I also assume that by Newton III, since the gas and piston have the same velocity, the work done on the gas is ##-W_g##.

So if we add a friction term ##F_{f}##, we would then obtain $$F_g-P_{ext}A - F_{f}=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$ which would consequently give [itex]W_{g} = W_{f} + \int{P_{ext}dV} [/itex] once equilibrium has been reached.

However, is it the case that if we want to analyse the system at a point where it has not yet reached equilibrium, the only correct route would be somehow integrate the internal pressure (excluding the case of the massless piston where this is always equal to the external pressure)?

Also, just as a sanity check, am I definitely correct in stating that the work done by the piston on the internal gas always equals the negative of the work done by the internal gas on the piston?
 
  • #5
etotheipi said:
Thank you, this is really useful. I also assume that by Newton III, since the gas and piston have the same velocity, the work done on the gas is ##-W_g##.

So if we add a friction term ##F_{f}##, we would then obtain $$F_g-P_{ext}A - F_{f}=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$ which would consequently give [itex]W_{g} = W_{f} + \int{P_{ext}dV} [/itex] once equilibrium has been reached.
Including piston friction is a little tricky, and one must be precise in specifying whether the system includes both the gas and the piston, or whether it includes only the gas. Both approaches, of course, will lead to the same final results, but the equations to reach these results will differ. For a more complete treatment specifically addressing piston friction, see this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/thermodynamics-gas-expansion-with-piston-friction.963282/
However, is it the case that if we want to analyse the system at a point where it has not yet reached equilibrium, the only correct route would be somehow integrate the internal pressure (excluding the case of the massless piston where this is always equal to the external pressure)?
To do it for the transient case (as a function of time), you would have to solve the compressible Navier Stokes viscous fluid equations (partial differential equations in space and time), in conjunction with the compressible continuity (mass balance) equation, and the differential thermal energy balance equation throughout the gas. If turbulence were present, this would be even more complicated.
Also, just as a sanity check, am I definitely correct in stating that the work done by the piston on the internal gas always equals the negative of the work done by the internal gas on the piston?
Yes. This is a consequence of Newton's 3rd law.
 

1. What is the significance of ignoring the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics?

Ignoring the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics is a simplification that allows us to focus on the overall behavior of a system rather than the specific movements of its individual components. This simplification is often necessary in order to make calculations and predictions about the thermodynamic properties of a system.

2. How does ignoring the acceleration of a piston affect the accuracy of thermodynamic calculations?

Ignoring the acceleration of a piston can introduce some error into thermodynamic calculations, as it does not take into account the energy required to accelerate the piston. However, for many practical applications, this error is small enough to be negligible and does not significantly impact the overall accuracy of the calculations.

3. Can ignoring the acceleration of a piston lead to incorrect conclusions in thermodynamic analyses?

In some cases, ignoring the acceleration of a piston can lead to incorrect conclusions in thermodynamic analyses. This is especially true in systems where the acceleration of the piston is a significant factor, such as in high-speed engines or compressors. In these cases, it is important to consider the acceleration of the piston in order to accurately predict the behavior of the system.

4. Are there any situations where it is necessary to consider the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics?

As mentioned previously, there are certain situations where it is necessary to consider the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics. This is particularly important in systems where the acceleration of the piston is a major factor, such as in high-speed engines or compressors. Additionally, if the accuracy of the calculations is crucial, it may be necessary to take into account the acceleration of the piston.

5. How can one determine whether or not to ignore the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics?

The decision to ignore or consider the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics depends on the specific system being analyzed and the level of accuracy required for the calculations. In general, if the acceleration of the piston is small compared to other factors in the system, it can be safely ignored. However, if the acceleration is a significant factor or the accuracy of the calculations is crucial, it is important to take it into account. Consulting with a thermodynamics expert can also help in making this determination.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
820
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
8
Views
543
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
56
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
574
Replies
7
Views
970
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
8
Views
825
Back
Top