Ignoring the acceleration of a piston in thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the assumptions made in thermodynamics regarding the acceleration of a piston, particularly in the context of force balances and work done by gases. Participants explore the implications of ignoring piston acceleration in various scenarios, including equilibrium and non-equilibrium states.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of ignoring piston acceleration, especially when internal gas pressure significantly exceeds external pressure.
  • Others propose that in the case of a massless frictionless piston, forces on opposing faces are equal, which may simplify analysis.
  • A force balance equation is presented, leading to a mechanical energy balance that relates work done by the gas to external pressure and kinetic energy of the piston.
  • Participants discuss the addition of friction to the model, noting that it complicates the analysis and requires careful specification of the system being considered.
  • There is a suggestion that analyzing the system before reaching equilibrium may necessitate integrating the internal pressure, particularly for cases where the piston is not massless.
  • One participant confirms that the work done by the piston on the internal gas is equal to the negative of the work done by the internal gas on the piston, referencing Newton's third law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of ignoring piston acceleration and the treatment of friction, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on assumptions about piston mass and friction, as well as the complexity introduced by analyzing non-equilibrium states and the need for advanced equations in such cases.

etotheipi
I was just reading a set of thermodynamics lecture notes and came across the following

1575743091926.png


In most thermodynamics problems I have done, it is indeed assumed that the piston does not accelerate so we can simply equate forces on the piston. However, I don't fully understand the line of reasoning given above.

For instance, if the pressure of the gas inside a frictionless piston far exceeds that of the external gas, surely it would be detrimental to ignore the acceleration?
 
Science news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
I was just reading a set of thermodynamics lecture notes and came across the following

View attachment 253810

In most thermodynamics problems I have done, it is indeed assumed that the piston does not accelerate so we can simply equate forces on the piston. However, I don't fully understand the line of reasoning given above.

For instance, if the pressure of the gas inside a frictionless piston far exceeds that of the external gas, surely it would be detrimental to ignore the acceleration?
I think it makes more sense to consider the case of a massless frictionless piston, in which case the forces acting on the two opposing faces are equal to one another. In any event, even if the piston has mass, if the system is in equilibrium at the final state, all the kinetic energy imparted to the piston during the process is recovered in the end when the piston is no longer moving.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
If we do a force balance on the piston, we obtain:
$$F_g-P_{ext}A=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$where ##F_g## is the force exerted by the gas on the piston. If we multiply this equation by the piston velocity v and integrate, we obtain the mechanical energy balance on the piston:$$W_g-\int{P_{ext}dV}=KE=m_{piston}\frac{v^2}{2}$$In the final state of the system, when the piston has reached its equilibrium position, its velocity and kinetic energy are zero. Therefore, for the final equilibrium state, $$W_g=\int{P_{ext}dV}$$and the work done by the gas on its surroundings is just the volume integral of the external force.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Chestermiller said:
If we do a force balance on the piston, we obtain:
$$F_g-P_{ext}A=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$where ##F_g## is the force exerted by the gas on the piston. If we multiply this equation by the piston velocity v and integrate, we obtain the mechanical energy balance on the piston:$$W_g-\int{P_{ext}dV}=KE=m_{piston}\frac{v^2}{2}$$In the final state of the system, when the piston has reached its equilibrium position, its velocity and kinetic energy are zero. Therefore, for the final equilibrium state, $$W_g=\int{P_{ext}dV}$$and the work done by the gas on its surroundings is just the volume integral of the external force.

Thank you, this is really useful. I also assume that by Newton III, since the gas and piston have the same velocity, the work done on the gas is ##-W_g##.

So if we add a friction term ##F_{f}##, we would then obtain $$F_g-P_{ext}A - F_{f}=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$ which would consequently give W_{g} = W_{f} + \int{P_{ext}dV} once equilibrium has been reached.

However, is it the case that if we want to analyse the system at a point where it has not yet reached equilibrium, the only correct route would be somehow integrate the internal pressure (excluding the case of the massless piston where this is always equal to the external pressure)?

Also, just as a sanity check, am I definitely correct in stating that the work done by the piston on the internal gas always equals the negative of the work done by the internal gas on the piston?
 
etotheipi said:
Thank you, this is really useful. I also assume that by Newton III, since the gas and piston have the same velocity, the work done on the gas is ##-W_g##.

So if we add a friction term ##F_{f}##, we would then obtain $$F_g-P_{ext}A - F_{f}=m_{piston}\frac{dv}{dt}$$ which would consequently give W_{g} = W_{f} + \int{P_{ext}dV} once equilibrium has been reached.
Including piston friction is a little tricky, and one must be precise in specifying whether the system includes both the gas and the piston, or whether it includes only the gas. Both approaches, of course, will lead to the same final results, but the equations to reach these results will differ. For a more complete treatment specifically addressing piston friction, see this thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/thermodynamics-gas-expansion-with-piston-friction.963282/
However, is it the case that if we want to analyse the system at a point where it has not yet reached equilibrium, the only correct route would be somehow integrate the internal pressure (excluding the case of the massless piston where this is always equal to the external pressure)?
To do it for the transient case (as a function of time), you would have to solve the compressible Navier Stokes viscous fluid equations (partial differential equations in space and time), in conjunction with the compressible continuity (mass balance) equation, and the differential thermal energy balance equation throughout the gas. If turbulence were present, this would be even more complicated.
Also, just as a sanity check, am I definitely correct in stating that the work done by the piston on the internal gas always equals the negative of the work done by the internal gas on the piston?
Yes. This is a consequence of Newton's 3rd law.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
901
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
951
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K