Imaginary unit - electrical charge relationship

AI Thread Summary
The imaginary unit is crucial in electrical engineering due to its ability to represent both magnitude and phase, which real numbers cannot do. While real numbers are effective for tasks involving ordered magnitudes, complex numbers excel in scenarios where phase information is essential, such as in wave analysis. This distinction highlights the importance of using the appropriate number system for specific applications. The discussion emphasizes that complex numbers are not just abstract concepts but have practical applications in understanding electrical charge and wave behavior. Overall, the relationship between imaginary units and electrical charge illustrates the necessity of different mathematical tools in engineering.
Helicobacter
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
In my Algebra 2 textbook it says that the imaginary unit finds practical application in electrical engineering. Is that because the imaginary unit is as elusive as electrical charge to rational perception?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
We use the real numbers for tasks well suited to using real numbers -- not because they're more "real' than other sorts of numbers.

In particular, real numbers have an ordering, so they are useful for describing things that have an ordering. In particular, they're good for describing magnitudes.


Similarly, we use complex numbers for tasks well suited to using complex numbers. For example, complex numbers can be viewed has having a magnitude and a phase (whereas the real numbers can only muster a magnitude and a sign). Thus, complex numbers are better than real numbers for describing things that have a phase. (For example, waves)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top