Impact force of an object dropped on a steel toed shoe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the impact force experienced by steel-toed shoes when subjected to a falling mass. While the shoes are rated to withstand 70 lbs of force, the impact scenario requires consideration of kinetic energy absorption rather than just static force. The gravitational force of a 31.7 kg mass is 311 N, but the force needed to stop the mass varies based on how quickly the shoe dissipates energy. The complexity arises in calculating the maximum mass that can be dropped from a height without shoe failure, as it depends on the shoe's force application characteristics. Clarifying that the shoe's rating is actually 70 foot-pounds provides a better understanding of its protective capabilities.
dan28029
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I often hear about collisions in terms of impact force. For instance, "the boxer delivered a punch with 100 lbs of force." I have a pair of steel toed shoes that are rated to withstand 70 lbs of force (311 N). But if the shoe experiences an impact instead of being loaded very gradually, wouldn't it be more informative to talk about how much energy the shoe can absorb without failing?

I know that a falling 31.7 kg mass will experience a gravitational force of 311 N, but that is not equal to the force required by the shoe to stop the mass, correct? Because the shoe must dissipate the kinetic energy that the mass has acquired, and the magnitude of the required force depends on how the shoe applies that force (over what time period and what displacement).

Let's say we wanted to know how large of a mass we could drop from 5 meters high without having the shoe fail. It seems to me like we could not calculate this, because we do not know the details about how the shoe applies the force to the mass.

I've had three years of classes in undergraduate mechanical engineering, but I'm still trying to fully wrap my head around Newtonian physics. Any light you guys could shed on this would be awesome, thanks in advance for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, now that I looked at the specification myself, I see that the shoes are rated up to 70 FOOT lbs. That makes more sense to me
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Back
Top