Impact Parameter: Solving Collision Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter sodaboy7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact Parameter
AI Thread Summary
Collision problems can be analyzed using conservation of momentum and energy, impulsive forces, and the impact parameter, which is the perpendicular distance between the centers of mass of colliding particles. When given the impact parameter, angular momentum conservation allows for separating radial and angular motion, with angular momentum treated as an effective potential in the radial direction. The effective potential acts like a fictitious force that pushes particles away from the center of mass, particularly in non-colliding scenarios. For forces following a 1/r^2 relationship, such as in Rutherford scattering, existing solutions can be applied. Understanding how to calculate the impact parameter or scattered angle is crucial for solving these problems effectively.
sodaboy7
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Any problem of collision can be solved using four equations: Conservation of momentum and energy, impulsive forces and impact parameter (distance between center of masses of the particle taken perpendicular to velocity). I can solve problems using first three cases. But how to analyse a problem when impact parameter is given as data. ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, angular momentum is conserved, so you can separate the motion into radial motion and angular motion. You can calculate the angular momentum from the impact parameter. You can solve the radial motion separately by treating the angular momentum as an effective potential acting in the radial direction. Find the minimum distance, and integrate the forces from infinity to the minimum distance. It's just some messy math.

Of course, the solution is already available for 1/r^2 forces (Rutherford scattering).
 
Ok. I got the first part. But can you please elaborate "effective potential" stuff a little more.
 
The effective potential is basically another way of writing the centrifugal force. It is a fictitious force which pushes stuff away from the center where r=0. If you consider two particles which pass beside each other without colliding and you write the equations of motion for one particle with respect to the center of mass frame, you see
dx/dt = dy/dt = dz/dt = 0, because there are no forces because these particles don't collide. But if you look at dr/dt, dr/dt > 0. There is an effective potential that pushes the particle away from the center of mass. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_potential
 
See Section titled Determining the Impact Parameter in

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/rutsca2.html

Plugging values of nuclear Z, the scattered angle, and the incident alpha particle energy into the empty boxes is sufficient to determine the dependent variable impact parameter b. So either the impact parameter or the scattered angle can be used as an input parameter.
 
Thanks
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top