Implicit diff (2 var), error or what?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trancefishy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Implicit
trancefishy
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
i am working on a homework assignment. it's easy, or, so i think...



Given.
3x^2 - xy^3 + sin(x^3 - y) = 4

Find \frac{dy}{dx}

not a problem. i ended up with

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac {6x - y^3 + 3x^2 cos(x^3 - y)}{3xy^2 + cos(x^3 - y)}

using implicit differention.

now, "What is the slope of the curve defined by the equation at the point (0, \pi)?"

at first, i plugged it into the derivative, ended up with \pi^3, but, upon inspection, i noticed that the point (0, \pi) does not exist in the original equation. am I to find the slope of the curve of the derivative, or is this a typo, or am i looking at this problem incorrectly? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wouldn't you just use point slope form: y-y_{1} = m(x-x_{1})? Just plug in the values into the derivative and work off from the above form?
 
um, point slope form looks messy, but that's besides the point. perhaps this wasn't clear enough. the point (0, \pi) doesn't exist in the original equation. not on the graph. sin(-\pi) does not equal 4. that's the crux of my problem.

IF the point was on the original graph, no problem, plug the values into the derivative and what I get is \pi^3.
 
Last edited:
trancefishy said:
um, point slope form looks messy, but that's besides the point. perhaps this wasn't clear enough. the point (0, \pi) doesn't exist in the original equation. not on the graph. sin(-\pi) does not equal 4. that's the crux of my problem.
Take the limit as x-> 0 and y -> Pi or look at the graph?
 
I think it is a typo. There are in infinite many tangent lines to a point... so the point would have to be on the curve in order for the derivative you found to be relavent.
 
looking at the graph is what caused me to realize the point isn't on there. it's not even close. now, as x approches 0 from the left, y approaches 2pi. the slope would also be increasing without bound. but that's for 2pi, which has no bearing on my problem.

it's becoming obvious to me that this must be a typo, though, it's so obviously incorrect i just dont' know how it got by
 
thank you, jameson
 
Back
Top