Implicit Differentiation w/ Composite Function

Loppyfoot
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the equation y= f(x) , at a certain point the slope of the curve is 1/2 and the x-coordinate decreases at 3 units/s. At that point, how fast is the y-coordinate of the object changing?





The Attempt at a Solution



Dy/dx = f ' (x) dx/dt

Would that be the correct way to begin this problem? Then plug in 3 for dx/dt and 1/2 for f'(x)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Loppyfoot said:

Homework Statement


Given the equation y= f(x) , at a certain point the slope of the curve is 1/2 and the x-coordinate decreases at 3 units/s. At that point, how fast is the y-coordinate of the object changing?

The Attempt at a Solution



Dy/dx = f ' (x) dx/dt

Would that be the correct way to begin this problem? Then plug in 3 for dx/dt and 1/2 for f'(x)?

Thanks
Not quite.
You have
y = f(x), where both y and x are assumed (implicitly) to be functions of t. I could write this as y(t) = f(x(t)), which would make the dependence of y and x on t explicit

dy/dt = d/dt(f(x(t)) = f'(x(t)) dx/dt
Here I have used the chain rule.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top