Improving reception from a transmitter

  • Thread starter Thread starter benben26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transmitter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Improving reception from a transmitter operating at 1GHz can be achieved through enhancements in antenna design and the use of Low Noise Amplifiers (LNA). Lowering the transmission frequency can extend range but necessitates larger antennas. In underwater scenarios, Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) is essential due to water absorption of higher frequencies. Factors such as transmitter power, modulation type, and receiver sensitivity significantly influence reception quality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antenna design principles
  • Knowledge of Low Noise Amplifiers (LNA)
  • Familiarity with frequency absorption characteristics in different mediums
  • Basic concepts of modulation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research antenna types suitable for long-distance transmission
  • Explore the impact of Low Noise Amplifiers (LNA) on signal quality
  • Investigate frequency absorption effects in various environments
  • Learn about different modulation techniques and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, telecommunications professionals, and anyone involved in designing or optimizing transmission systems for improved signal reception.

benben26
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need some points on how one would improve reception from a transmitter. The frequency of the transmission is originally 1GHz.


The Attempt at a Solution




Would deceasing the transmission frequency improve reception? Any other pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This has not much to do with frequency. Better antenna, and LNA will improve reception considerably.

If you are in a submarine underwater, then you are constrained to use ULF frequencies (ultra low) because higher frequencies are absorbed by the water. Also at 23 GHz and 60 GHz there is a signal absorption from water vapor and oxygen in the air.
 
Tell us a little about your link. What have you tried so far? What kind of antennas does it use? How much power is your transmitter putting out? What kind of modulation are you using? How far away is your receiver? Do you know the sensitivity of your receiver?

Usually frequency is a given, not a variable. What is the purpose of your link?
 
Its a hypothetical question, a transmitter has been attatched to an elephant and it is being used to track the elephant.

Thanks for your help!
 
It's a trade off. Lower frequencies cover longer distances for the same power but require larger antennas. The optimum frequency would depend on factors such as the range, how long you expect the transmitter battery to last, what percentage of the time the transmitter is transmitting and so on. Is your receiver stationary or mobile? Often the mobile receiver uses a directional antenna to determine the direction of the transmitter.

I'm sure these devices already exist. You might investigate what frequency they use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
861
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K