Impulse and Coefficient of Restitution from Ball Drop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the impulse delivered to a ball dropped from a height of 3 meters onto a steel plate and determining the coefficient of restitution. The impulse can be interpreted as the change in momentum of the ball, which requires knowing the velocities before and after the collision. Participants clarify that the ball's acceleration remains 9.8 m/s² downward after the collision, despite its upward velocity. It is emphasized that the system is not isolated due to external forces, and the change in momentum must be calculated using kinematic equations or conservation of energy. The final calculations will lead to the answers for both impulse and the coefficient of restitution.
KatyM7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This thread is not written using the Homework Template. The use of the homework template is mandatory and will help our members help you.
A 1.2kg ball dropped from a height of 3m onto a steel plate rigidly attached to the ground bounces back up to a height of 2.5m.(a). What is the impulse delivered to the ball by the plate? (b). What is the coefficient of restitution of the collision?I know my instructor wants me to use something along the lines of a=Δv/Δt; ma= m (Δv/Δt)= Δp/Δt; delta p= maΔt= (ΣF)Δt
Honestly I'm lost on this one because of the whole Δt when I am not given time...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello KatyM7,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

There are two equivalent ways to interpret impulse.

The first, is impulse is force times time: The force applied to an object multiplied by the time interval that the force was applied. (For a uniform force, this is simply \vec J = \vec F \Delta t. On the other hand if the force varies with time, then a little calculus is involved, but that's more than I want to get into here.)

That definition is fine and dandy, but it doesn't help you much for this particular problem since you don't know what the force was nor how long it was applied. Fortunately, it's not the only way to view impulse.

For reasons which you've already worked out in your original post, impulse is can also be viewed as an object's change in momentum. What is the ball's momentum at the instant after it collides with the steel plate relative to its momentum at the instant before the collision?

(Hint: don't forget that momentum, like force and impulse, is a vector with both magnitude and direction.)
 
collinsmark said:
Hello KatyM7,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

There are two equivalent ways to interpret impulse.

The first, is impulse is force times time: The force applied to an object multiplied by the time interval that the force was applied. (For a uniform force, this is simply \vec J = \vec F \Delta t. On the other hand if the force varies with time, then a little calculus is involved, but that's more than I want to get into here.)

That definition is fine and dandy, but it doesn't help you much for this particular problem since you don't know what the force was nor how long it was applied. Fortunately, it's not the only way to view impulse.

For reasons which you've already worked out in your original post, impulse is can also be viewed as an object's change in momentum. What is the ball's momentum at the instant after it collides with the steel plate relative to its momentum at the instant before the collision?

(Hint: don't forget that momentum, like force and impulse, is a vector with both magnitude and direction.)
The ball's acceleration the instant before the collision would be equal to gravity (9.8m/s^2) and after the collision since it is moving in the opposite direction a=-9.8m/s^2. The ball's mass doesn't change, again the unknown is time. If I am not mistaken this in an isolated system? If so then P(final)= P(initial) in the opposite direction, therefore Δp=0. Please correct me if I am mistaken. Thank you for your help! :)
 
KatyM7 said:
The ball's acceleration the instant before the collision would be equal to gravity (9.8m/s^2)
Well, okay. But I was asking more about momentum though.

But yes, the ball acceleration the instant before the collision is 9.8 m/s2 in the down direction.

and after the collision since it is moving in the opposite direction a=-9.8m/s^2.

Well, no, that's not true. After the collision, even though the ball is moving up (velocity is up) its acceleration is still 9.8 m/s2 in the down direction.

But anyway, I'm asking about the ball's change in momentum. Not the ball's change in acceleration.

Momentum, \vec p is

\vec p = m \vec v
The ball's mass doesn't change, again the unknown is time. If I am not mistaken this in an isolated system?

The ball is definitely not an isolated system. It encounters the external impulse brought on by the steel plate, and not to mention that it is undergoing an external gravitational force the whole while.

If so then P(final)= P(initial) in the opposite direction, therefore Δp=0. Please correct me if I am mistaken.

I believe that answer is mistaken.

Use your kinematics equations to find the velocity of the ball immediately before impact knowing the initial height of the ball is 3 m. Alternatively, you could use conservation of energy; either way is fine. Then do the same to find the velocity of the ball immediately after the collision, knowing the final height of the ball is 2.5 m.

Finally, calculate the ball's change in momentum during the collision with the steel plate. [Edit: then move on to part b.]
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top