Impulsive force during collision between solid and liquid

draaz1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am trying to model an impact between a solid and a liquid as a 1D elastic collision where KE and momentum are conserved. Calculating the impulse is no problem. My problem in when I try to come up with an accurate collision time in order to calculate impulsive forces. Does anyone know of a reasonably accurate approach to find these forces.


Homework Equations



Conservation of KE, Conservation of Momentum, Herztian correlations for impacting solids, elastic coefficients of impacted materials.


The Attempt at a Solution



Use Hertzian correlations between two elastic solids to get an idea of the impact time (around .003s) for my initial conditions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that it is reasonable to model a solid-liquid collision as elastic? Usually, such a collision is quite inelastic, since the configuration of the liquid doesn't even restore until many collision timescales later (e.g. the ripples in the surface of a pool will continue for several seconds or minutes, even though the tennis ball only makes contact with the surface of the water for less than a second).

The only idea that I have to theoretically determine the collision force is to consider bouyancy. However, I would expect that surface effects are also significant (e.g. surface tension), but I don't know how to deal with that.
 
I modeled the collision as elastic to be conservative because it would cause the maximum transfer of energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top