In ground state, are spins aligned or anti-aligned?

Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
In a past physics gre question (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=192334), we make use of the idea that the ground state energy of two ions that have spin is when the spins are aligned.

However, the ground state of the helium atom is a spin singlet state, which is a linear combo of two spins ANTI-aligned.

Can anyone please explain this discrepancy to me? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which state is the ground state depends on the expression for the Hamiltonian. Take for example the easiest spin-spin interaction for two particles:
$$
H=\lambda \vec{S}_1\cdot \vec{S}_2.
$$
Suppose \lambda>0, then, in order to minimize the energy you want \vec{S}_1\cdot \vec{S}_2<0, i.e. anti-alligned spins. On the other hand if \lambda<0 you want the spins to be alligned.

So, there is no definitive way of determining if the ground state is same- or opposite-spins. It depends on the interaction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
well, you can't have two electrons in the same spin state if they have the same quantum numbers for everything else, since they are fermions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top