Inclined plane problem, weight of subject

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the weight measured by a scale when a man stands on a frictionless inclined plane, specifically a wedge. The initial assumption is that the weight would be measured as mgcos(x) if on a regular block. However, confusion arises regarding the effects of the wedge's angle and the block's acceleration. It is clarified that if the block is sliding, the scale would read a modified weight of m(g-a), where 'a' is the acceleration of the block. Ultimately, understanding the forces and accelerations involved is crucial for determining the correct reading on the scale.
ellano
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2mric7s.jpg
This man has mass 'm' and the angle of the plane is 'x'. The inclined plane is frictionless. He is standing on a scale which is placed on top of the blue wedge, what weight will the scale measure?

Homework Equations



300px-Free_body.svg.png

The Attempt at a Solution



If the man was standing on a regular block, I would say his weight would be equal to

mgcos(x)

But I am confused as to whether standing on a wedge would change things.

Thanks for trying to help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The block is sliding with an acceleration gsin(theta). Find its vertical component. When the block is falling freely, the reaction or reading in scale will be zero. If it is falling vertically with some acceleration, what will be the reaction?
 
Well, if the man was on a block like the following:

xd9obt.jpg



And that ramp was inclined at angle theta, I would say that the downwards acceleration would be gcos(theta), and so the scale would read mgcos(theta).

But, in the problem from the first post with the blue wedge, the man and the scale are actually standing on a flat surface.

So, in that case, I don't know how to draw the vectors in order to figure out what force is being put on the scale.
 
In the first case if the block is stationary, the scale will read his weight. Since it is sliding, the new weight will be m(g-a). In non inertial frame, pseudo force is in the opposite direction to the actual force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top