Inclusive, semi-exclusive and exclusive nuclear reaction

Manojg
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

What is the difference among inclusive, semi-exclusive and exclusive nuclear reaction?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inclusive: All final particle variables are summed over (or not measured).
semi-exclusive: The variables of one or sometimes more particles are measured.
exclusive: All final particle variables are measured.
 
Hi pam,

Thanks a lot for your reply. Would you give me an example showing all these three measurements.
 
Inclusive: e+p-->e'+anything
Semi-inclusive (I think this is more commonly used than semi-exclusive.): e+p-->e'+pi+anything
Exclusive: e+p-->e'+p+pi
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top