Increase in numerical aperture leads to a decrease in line width?

AI Thread Summary
An increase in numerical aperture (NA) is generally associated with improved resolution and a decrease in minimum line width. However, confusion arises when considering the relationship between NA and the illuminated area, as higher NA can lead to a larger exposed area on the substrate, potentially increasing the minimum line width. The discussion clarifies that minimum line width refers to the smallest feature size that can be reliably imaged in semiconductor fabrication. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding these definitions to reconcile the apparent contradiction between theoretical formulas and practical outcomes. Ultimately, clarity on these concepts is essential for accurate application in semiconductor lithography.
kololo
Messages
8
Reaction score
5
1721285947179.png

According to the formula, an increase in numerical aperture leads to a decrease in minimum line width and thus better resolution.
However, if were to draw it out, given the same depth of focus, why does the minimum line width increase with higher numerical aperture?
 
Science news on Phys.org
kololo said:
View attachment 348515
According to the formula, an increase in numerical aperture leads to a decrease in minimum line width and thus better resolution.
However, if were to draw it out, given the same depth of focus, why does the minimum line width increase with higher numerical aperture?
Can you post a link to where you got that figure? It looks like it is confusing minimum line width (optical resolution) and illuminated area.

See if this link about NA and optical resolution helps:

https://www.photometrics.com/learn/microscopy-basics/resolution-and-numerical-aperture
 
Thank you for your reply.

It was from notes provided by my school (semiconductor lithography).
It suggests the illuminated area. When the positive resist on the substrate is exposed to light, it becomes soluble and is washed off. This leaves a feature on the substrate. The line width was defined as the minimum feature size, which is the length of the resist that was washed off.

So, in the case of high NA, a larger area will be exposed to light. Hence, the feature printed will be larger (larger line width). This suggests that the line width corresponds to the illuminated area.

However, the formula suggests otherwise. It seems like I am either missing something to link these two theories together, or my understanding is wrong.
 
kololo said:
So, in the case of high NA, a larger area will be exposed to light. Hence, the feature printed will be larger (larger line width). This suggests that the line width corresponds to the illuminated area.
No. In my experience with semiconductor fabrication, the "minimum line width" or "minimum feature size" pertains to the smallest horizontal width of metal or poly that you can reliably image. So when we say that our process is 10 nanometer, that means that the thinnest trace widths and thinnest transistor channels that we can reliably image and make are 10 nanometers wide.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_device_fabrication

1721396648081.png
 
  • Like
Likes difalcojr and kololo
Ohh, I must have misunderstood the definition of minimum linewidth. Thank you for the clarification.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top