Increasing or decreasing - logarithms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the function \( y = \ln\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \) is increasing or decreasing without the use of calculators or graphing tools. Participants explore the properties of logarithmic functions and their transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rewriting the function in terms of exponential forms and question how to apply known properties of exponential functions to determine growth or decay. There is also mention of derivatives and their role in understanding function behavior, with some expressing a desire to avoid calculus methods.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the function's behavior being explored. Some participants suggest alternative approaches to understanding the function's characteristics, while others clarify the relationship between the function and its inverse.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the class context may not officially cover derivatives yet, which influences their approach to the problem. There is also a mention of differing terminology between regions regarding calculus and analysis.

Rectifier
Gold Member
Messages
313
Reaction score
4
Hey there!
How do I determine whether this function is growing or decreasing without using any calculator or graphing tools?
[tex]y=ln(\frac{1}{x})[/tex]
I know that
[tex]y=ln(\frac{1}{x}) \ \Leftrightarrow \ e^y=\frac{1}{x} \ \ \ (1)[/tex]
Then I tried to use the formula
[tex]f(x)=a^x[/tex] and then determine whether a is 0<a<1 or a>1. But I don't know how I should do to write (1) in the same same manner :( .

If a is 0<a<1 means that the function is strictly decreasing.
If a is a>1 means that the function is strictly increasing.

Could someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rectifier said:
Hey there!
How do I determine whether this function is growing or decreasing without using any calculator or graphing tools?
[tex]y=ln(\frac{1}{x})[/tex]
I know that
[tex]y=ln(\frac{1}{x}) \ \Leftrightarrow \ e^y=\frac{1}{x} \ \ \ (1)[/tex]
Then I tried to use the formula
[tex]f(x)=a^x[/tex] and then determine whether a is 0<a<1 or a>1. But I don't know how I should do to write (1) in the same same manner :( .

If a is 0<a<1 means that the function is strictly decreasing.
If a is a>1 means that the function is strictly increasing.

Could someone please help me?

Your function doesn't have that form. Is this a calculus class? Can't you just take the derivative?
 
Dick said:
Your function doesn't have that form. Is this a calculus class? Can't you just take the derivative?

I don't know if its calculus or not. Its called one-dimensional analysis and its a class I take where I live - in Sweden.

There should be another way to do that than the derivative since I must be able to plot the function after that without a calculator or a graphing tool.

I am sorry if this is the wrong subforum.
 
Rectifier said:
I don't know if its calculus or not. Its called one-dimensional analysis and its a class I take where I live - in Sweden.

There should be another way to do that than the derivative since I must be able to plot the function after that without a calculator or a graphing tool.

I am sorry if this is the wrong subforum.

I think the forum is ok. If you have 1/x=e^y then you have x=e^(-y)=(1/e)^y. That will let you plot x=f(y) as a decreasing function of y since (1/e)<1. What does your graph translate to when you think of y as a function of x?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Rectifier said:
I don't know if its calculus or not. Its called one-dimensional analysis and its a class I take where I live - in Sweden.

There should be another way to do that than the derivative since I must be able to plot the function after that without a calculator or a graphing tool.

I am sorry if this is the wrong subforum.
Yes, "analysis" is "Calculus". (In the United States we tend to use the word "Analysis" to mean "the theory behind Calculus" so a higher level course than "Calculus".)

Why would not using a calculator or graphing tool mean you cannot take the derivative?

The derivative of ln(1/x)= - ln(x) is -1/x. You can tell where that is positive or negative without a calculator, can't you?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you for your comment!

You went through f(y) to determine whether the function is decreasing or increasing in terms of x being a funtion of y to then mirror the function on the x=y line and get the inverse which is the original function. But the nice thing here is that since the inverse is increasing this must mean that the original is increasing too.

Did I get it right?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, "analysis" is "Calculus". (In the United States we tend to use the word "Analysis" to mean "the theory behind Calculus" so a higher level course than "Calculus".)

Why would not using a calculator or graphing tool mean you cannot take the derivative?

The derivative of ln(1/x)= - ln(x) is -1/x. You can tell where that is positive or negative without a calculator, can't you?

Yeah I can :) but oficially I am not allowed to use derivatives since I am not at that chapter of the book :D.

I like to have more than one way to the solution. Thank you for your comment HallsofIvy :)
 
Rectifier said:
Hey there!
How do I determine whether this function is growing or decreasing without using any calculator or graphing tools?
[tex]y=ln(\frac{1}{x})[/tex]
I know that
[tex]y=ln(\frac{1}{x}) \ \Leftrightarrow \ e^y=\frac{1}{x} \ \ \ (1)[/tex]
Then I tried to use the formula
[tex]f(x)=a^x[/tex] and then determine whether a is 0<a<1 or a>1. But I don't know how I should do to write (1) in the same same manner :( .

If a is 0<a<1 means that the function is strictly decreasing.
If a is a>1 means that the function is strictly increasing.

Could someone please help me?

[tex]y = \ln \left( \frac{1}{x}\right) = - \ln(x)[/tex]
Do you know what the graph of ##\ln(x)## looks like?

BTW: in LaTeX you should write "\ln" instead of "ln", because it produces better-looking results: compare ##ln(x)##, entered as # # ln(x) # # (no spaces) with ##\ln(x)##, entered as # #\ln(x) # # (no spaces).
 
Last edited:
Rectifier said:
Thank you for your comment!

You went through f(y) to determine whether the function is decreasing or increasing in terms of x being a funtion of y to then mirror the function on the x=y line and get the inverse which is the original function. But the nice thing here is that since the inverse is increasing this must mean that the original is increasing too.

Did I get it right?

Right idea, but x=(1/e)^y isn't increasing. I hope that was a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Dick said:
Right idea, but x=(1/e)^y isn't increasing. I hope that was a typo.

Hehe indeed I was going to write decreasing. Thank you for your help :)
 
  • #11
Ray Vickson said:
[tex]y = \ln \left( \frac{1}{x}\right) = - \ln(x)[/tex]
Do you know what the graph of ##\ln(x)## looks like?
Oh, I didnt see that option! Thank you for pointing this out!


Ray Vickson said:
BTW: in LaTeX you should write "\ln" instead of "ln", because it produces better-looking results: compare ##ln(x)##, entered as # # ln(x) # # (no spaces) with ##\ln(x)##, entered as # #\ln(x) # # (no spaces).
Thank you yet again :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K