How Do You Calculate Phase and Group Velocity from Refractive Index Data?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate phase and group velocity from refractive index data, the phase velocity can be determined using the relation V_phase = c/n, where n is the refractive index. The wavelength in the medium differs from that in a vacuum, necessitating the use of the relation λ_medium = λ_vacuum/n to find the correct wavelength. For group velocity, the derivative dn/dλ can be estimated from the graph of n(λ) by selecting two points to find the slope, assuming the graph is approximately linear. The relationship between phase and group velocity can be expressed as V_group = V_phase(1 + (λ/n)(dn/dλ)). This approach provides a systematic way to derive both velocities from the given refractive index data.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
given is a graph of n(lambda) vs lambda where n is the index of refraction
N(1000) =1.45

Estimate Vphase and group velocity using the above info.

i know that n = \frac{c}{v_{\phi}} = \frac{ck}{\omega}

i can't simply susbtitute into that above relation because the lambda given is that lambda in the vacuum and thus the lambda would be different in the medium. Also oncei found v phase how would i go about finding group velcoity, since group velocity is a derivative, do i simply pick off two points on the graph and find the slope?

But first i need to figure out phase velocity which i can't get and i don't know if its right

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i know that V_{\phi} = \frac{\omega}{k}
where omega is the angular velocity of the wave and is 2 pi / T
and k is the wave number 2pi / lambda
however since it is in another medium with index of refraction 1.45 would the lambda be different??

would i have to use the following relation to figure out the lambda in that respective medium isnce the wavelength given is that wavelength in a vacuum (right?)
\frac{n_{1}}{n_{2}} = \frac{v_{2}}{v_{1}} = \frac{\lambda_{2}}{n_{1}} = \frac{f_{2}}{f_{1}}
and since in a vacuum n1 = 1 then i can find the lambda 2 the lambda in the medium?

then i back substitute in the above relation and figure out the frequency as well.
im not quite sure where this leads to... i am going off on a tangent
im given n (wvelegnth) not n(angular frequency) which isn eeded to find the phase velocity
 
stunner5000pt said:
given is a graph of n(lambda) vs lambda where n is the index of refraction
N(1000) =1.45

Estimate Vphase and group velocity using the above info.

i know that n = \frac{c}{v_{\phi}} = \frac{ck}{\omega}

i can't simply susbtitute into that above relation because the lambda given is that lambda in the vacuum and thus the lambda would be different in the medium. Also oncei found v phase how would i go about finding group velcoity, since group velocity is a derivative, do i simply pick off two points on the graph and find the slope?

But first i need to figure out phase velocity which i can't get and i don't know if its right

Please help!
SOLUTION HINTS:
Problem presents {n = n(λ)} for a given dispersive medium.
Continue in direction you've begun to determine "vphase" and "vgroup" in the dispersive medium:

1: \ \ \ \ \ v_{phase} \ \ = \ \ \frac{c}{n} \ \ = \ \ \frac{\omega}{k}

2: \ \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \ \ \ \omega \ \ = \ \ \frac{ck}{n}

3: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \ \ \ \frac{d\omega}{dk} \ \ = \ \ \frac{c}{n} \ \ - \ \ \frac{ck}{n^{2}}\left(\frac{dn}{dk}\right) \ \ = \ \ \frac{c}{n}\left(1 \ - \ \frac{k}{n}\left(\frac{dn}{dk}\right) \right)

4: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \ \ \ \mathbf{v_{group}} \ \ = \ \ \mathbf{v_{phase} }\left ( 1 \ - \ \frac{k}{n} \left ( \frac{dn}{dk} \right ) \right ) \ \ = \ \ \mathbf{v_{phase} }\left ( 1 \ + \ \frac{\lambda}{n} \color{red} \left ( \frac{dn}{d\lambda} \right ) \color{black} \right )

Determine relationship between "vphase" and "vgroup" in the dispersive medium from Eq #4, where derivative in red is evaluated from the given function {n = n(λ)}.


~~
 
Last edited:
so for number 4 the derivative is calculated by using two points and finding the slope of the graph (it did ask for an estimate, after all) ?

is that the right way?
 
stunner5000pt said:
so for number 4 the derivative is calculated by using two points and finding the slope of the graph (it did ask for an estimate, after all) ?

is that the right way?
Without seeing the graph, it's difficult to judge. However, your method would be reasonable if the graph were approx linear. Incidentally, you should find that {(dn/dλ) < 0}


~~
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top