Induced magnetic field in a cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a confusion regarding the calculation of the induced magnetic field in a cylinder within a magnetic field, specifically in relation to a problem from a graduate exam. The main point of contention is the use of the current density value from part a when calculating the induced magnetic field in part b, and whether an ordinary differential equation (ODE) is necessary for this process. It is clarified that the problem only requires an approximation for the current density up to the first two orders of frequency, rather than an exact analytical solution. The complexity of solving a system of partial differential equations (PDEs) is acknowledged, but deemed unnecessary for the problem's requirements. The conversation emphasizes the importance of carefully understanding the problem's demands to avoid confusion.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am confused about the first EM problem on http://web.mit.edu/physics/current/graduate/exams/gen2_F00.pdf (page 4, with the cylinder in a magnetic field). The solution can be found http://web.mit.edu/physics/current/graduate/exams/gen2sol_F00.pdf. In part a the solution is straightforward. However I am a bit confused about part b. They divide the cylinder in solenoids and calculate the field a a given point produced by these solenoids. This makes sense. However, when they plug in the value of ##j(t)## they use the value from part a, and I am not sure why we can do this. In a simple RL circuit you have an ODE that you solve to find the current as a function of time. Here if I understand well, they calculate the induced magnetic field created be ##j## from part a, and use that to calculate the new ##j##, but once you take self inductance into account, ##j## from part a is not there anymore. Don't you need to calculate the magnetic field induced by this new ##j## to find ##j## at a later time, and this way you need an ODE? What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right if the problem was asking for the exact analytical solution for the current density then you would need to solve a system of partial differential equations (apply Maxwell's equation's in differential form with the boundary conditions imposed by this problem and then solve them, my guess is that the system of PDE's going to be very hard and we can hope only for numerical solutions). (or another method would be to solve an ODE for each solenoid as you said, we would have infinitely many ODE's and they would be coupled due to mutual induction between the solenoids but that's another story).

BUT the problem doesn't ask for the exact analytical solution, it just asks for the next order (of ##\omega##) correction to the current density j. In other words it asks for an approximation solution that gives the j up to the first two orders of ##\omega##, while from taylor's series we know that j will probably contain more orders, possibly infinite.
 
Last edited:
Delta² said:
You are right if the problem was asking for the exact analytical solution for the current density then you would need to solve a system of partial differential equations (apply Maxwell's equation's in differential form with the boundary conditions imposed by this problem and then solve them, my guess is that the system of PDE's going to be very hard and we can hope only for numerical solutions).

But the problem doesn't ask for the exact analytical solution, it just asks for the next order (of ##\omega##) correction to the current density j. In other words it asks for an approximation solution that gives the j up to the first two orders of ##\omega##, while from taylor's series we know that j will probably contain more orders, possibly infinite.
Thanks a lot! I feel stupid now for asking this...
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Nope don't feel stupid, we all sometimes, just need to read more carefully what the problem asks for :D
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top