Induction Foil Iron vs. Aluminum

AI Thread Summary
Aluminum foil is commonly used in induction sealing due to its cost-effectiveness, despite concerns about its heating efficiency compared to magnetic materials like iron. While iron has higher magnetic permeability, which typically allows for better induction heating, aluminum's higher thermal conductance plays a significant role in its effectiveness. The thickness of aluminum foil relative to its skin depth increases its resistance, complicating the heating process. Ultimately, the choice of aluminum over iron in induction applications may be influenced more by economic factors than purely engineering considerations. The discussion highlights the balance between material properties and cost in induction heating technologies.
Watson
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone.

This question revolves around induction/cap sealing - or just induction heating in general.

Does anyone have an idea of why aluminum foil is used in induction sealing vs. using something that is magnetic, such as iron foil? My initial thought is simply aluminum foil being significantly cheaper, but I am curious is someone could answer this from an engineering perspective. Does aluminum foil heat more efficiently than magnetic iron foil?

Thanks guys!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Good question. My initial thought is that aluminum would be much more difficult to heat with induction, as iron typically has a much higher permeability. My money is on the cost.
 
stinsonbr said:
Good question. My initial thought is that aluminum would be much more difficult to heat with induction, as iron typically has a much higher permeability. My money is on the cost.

Mine as well. Aluminum has higher thermal conductance than iron/steel, and as a the foil itself is much smaller than the skin depth of aluminum, the resistance is bumped up significantly. That being said, the skin depth in magnetic iron foil should be similar when you take into account the permeability. Stumped on this one.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top