Inelastic collision physics help

AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly inelastic collision between two cars, both traveling at different speeds, the goal is to find the final velocity of the wreckage. The discussion reveals that both cars have equal mass, which simplifies calculations since their masses cancel out in the equations. The total momentum before the collision is calculated, leading to a final velocity of approximately 82.76 km/hr after the collision. Participants express confusion over the need for specific mass values, but it is clarified that the equal masses allow for simplification in the calculations. Ultimately, the focus remains on determining the final velocity of the combined wreckage post-collision.
jtw2e
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Car A travels North at 35km/hr.
Car B travels East at 75 km/hr.
Mass of Car A = Mass of Car B
Cars have a perfectly inelastic collision.

Homework Equations


What is the magnitude of the velocity of the tangled mess after the collision? (km/hr)


The Attempt at a Solution


Px = PAx + PBx = MB(0) + MA(75) = 75km/hr*MA

Py = PAy + PBy = MB(35) + MA(0) = 35km/hr*MB

SQRT[(MA*35km/hr)+(MB*75km/hr)]

PTotal= 82.76km/hr*MA

P=mv
v=P/m = (88.76km/hr*[STRIKE]M[/STRIKE]A)/([STRIKE]MA[/STRIKE]+MB)


tanθ = Py/Px = (35km/hr*[STRIKE]M[/STRIKE])/(75km/hr*[STRIKE]M[/STRIKE]) = 0.4666667

tan-1(0.46666667) = 25.01689 degrees.


I'm lost here... I have no idea how to get the mass OR velocity of the wreckage pile after the wreck... Please help. I have verified that my angle is at least correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jtw2e! :smile:

(why do you keep using "STRIKE" ? :confused:)
jtw2e said:
P=mv
v=P/m = (88.76km/hr*[STRIKE]M[/STRIKE]A)/([STRIKE]MA[/STRIKE]+MB)

I'm lost here... I have no idea how to get the mass OR velocity of the wreckage pile after the wreck... Please help. I have verified that my angle is at least correct.


I don't understand :redface:

you know the mass is MA + MB, and you've found v :confused:
 


tiny-tim said:
hi jtw2e! :smile:

(why do you keep using "STRIKE" ? :confused:)

I don't understand :redface:

you know the mass is MA + MB, and you've found v :confused:


Hi tiny-tim,
I used strike to show that M/M = 1... i.e. those particular masses canceled. I have not found the V of the system after the collision, which is Ptotal/Masstotal. I haven't been able to find that value I don't know the mass of either car.

So I'm stuck with Vfinal = (88.76km/hr)/MB

I have two unknowns. Somehow I have to find the mass of the cars, OR perhaps there is some other way to find the V? I tried to start a Conservation of Energy approach but since I didn't know mass for the Kinetic Energies, that didn't help.
 
Last edited:
jtw2e said:
… I don't know the mass of either car …

yes you do! … the masses are the same! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
yes you do! … the masses are the same! :smile:

Two unknowns: velocity and mass. Need a value to calculate either one. The fact that they are the same simplifies things, but I don't see how it gives me a number... such as 1500kg or 2000kg, etc...
 
but they'll all cancel! :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
but they'll all cancel! :smile:

v=P/m = (88.76km/hr*MA)/(MA+MB)

They don't all cancel. Only one of the masses cancels. You are left dividing by the other. Are my formulas in error?
 
Last edited:
jtw2e said:
v=P/m = (88.76km/hr*MA)/(MA+MB)

They don't all cancel. Only one of the masses cancels. You are left dividing by the other. If they all canceled we would be dividing by 0. Are my formulas in error?

of course they cancel …
MA/(MA + MB) = MA/(2MB) = 1/2 :rolleyes:
 


Sorry, the number should be 82.76km/hr (can't read my own writing).

tiny-tim said:
of course they cancel …
MA/(MA + MB) = MA/(2MB) = 1/2 :rolleyes:

Even so, V = 82.76 km/hr / .5M

It's still 1/2 times some number M. That number M is what I need to find V. Otherwise all I know is V = 165.5 / M
 
  • #10
you must have missed an M somewhere :wink:
 
  • #11


tiny-tim said:
you must have missed an M somewhere :wink:



It's been...a very... long two weeks. ;)

Thanks for putting up with my... frustration and confusion.
 
  • #12
jtw2e said:
It's been...a very... long two weeks. ;)

actually, it's only been 2 hours! :biggrin:

get some sleep! :zzz:
 
Back
Top