Inelastic Collisions and ratio of their masses

AI Thread Summary
In a totally inelastic collision where two objects of equal speed collide, half of the initial kinetic energy is lost. The conservation of momentum equation is m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2)vf, with v1 and v2 being equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. The challenge lies in incorporating the kinetic energy loss into the equations correctly. The approach involves setting up the kinetic energy equation as 0.5 * m1 * v1^2 + 0.5 * m2 * v2^2 = 0.5 * (m1 + m2) * vf^2, factoring in the energy loss. The final goal is to derive the mass ratio m1/m2 accurately through algebraic manipulation.
sleepingarmy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two objects moving in opposite directions with the same speed undergo a totally inelastic collision, and half the initial kinetic energy is lost. Find the ratio of their masses, m1/m2.

Homework Equations



m1v1+m2v2=(m1+m2)vf
The objects are moving in opposite directions with the same speed, so v1=-v2=v

The Attempt at a Solution



The part that gets me is the part that says half the kinetic energy is lost. Could someone explain how I factor that into the equations? If I just solve for m1/m2, plugging in 1/2v for vf(I don't know if that's right) I get 3, which is not the correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the collision were perfectly elastic, kinetic energy is conserved. But it is totally inelastic and 1/2 of the energy is lost. Therefore you can say:

.5 * m1 * v1^2 + .5 * m2 * v2^2 = (.5 * (m1 + m2)* vf^2) * .5

Then start cranking on the algebra to get m1/m2.
 
That makes sense. However, when I solve for m1/m2 I get (.5vf^2 + v^20/(v^2-.5vf^2) when I need an actual ratio.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top