Inelastic relativistic collision

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic relativistic collision involving a particle with rest mass m_{0} moving at 0.8c and another particle with rest mass 3m_{0} at rest, conservation laws for total energy and quadrimpulse are applicable. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing conserved quantities to solve the problem, suggesting the use of a reference frame centered on the moving particle. Participants are encouraged to express the total energy before and after the collision to derive necessary equations. The concept of quadrimpulse is clarified as a four-dimensional vector that generalizes the traditional momentum vector, integrating space and time into a unified framework. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the final rest mass of the combined particle post-collision.
armandowww
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
A particle with rest mass m_{0} moves at a speed of 0,8c. It's going to collide with a particle with rest mass 3m_{0}. If the latter was standing still before impact and if the collision is completely inelastic, what are the conservation laws valid? What is the final single particle rest mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?
 
In my opinion, the total energy and the quadrimpulse must conserve. We can use a reference frame system centered in the first particle and consider the target particle as coming toward the origin in relative motion...
 
quadrimpulse? What's that? I hope it's a typo...

Meanwhile, write down an expression for the total energy of the system before and after the collision, that should get you one of the two equations you need.
 
Certainly the key to the problem is recognize what is physically being conserved.
Then, if you think geometrically, your math problem can be solved by drawing the appropriate triangle [for this inelastic collision] and realizing that you are essentially using the analogue of the law of cosines.
 
quadrimpulse? What's that? I hope it's a typo...

I was taught that, in restrict relativity, quadrimpulse is introduced as a four-dimensional vector resulting on the generalization of common momentum vector which, on the contrary, is featured by tri-dimensions.
Its formal expression could be given as: \underline{p}\equiv \left(m\vec{v},mc\right)\equiv \left(\vec{p},mc\right). This definition remainds to the famous issue that space (3D) and time (1D) are not to be considered apart any more, because they are interrelated each other and behave as as a whole, the space-time (4D).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top