TFT Monitor Recommendations for Optimal Gaming Experience

AI Thread Summary
A user is looking to purchase a 17" TFT monitor due to headaches from their current display and is not interested in built-in speakers. Recommendations for brands include NEC, Sony, Samsung, and ViewSonic, with ViewSonic noted for its popularity among graphic professionals. Concerns about the 5:4 aspect ratio of 17" and 19" LCD monitors compared to the traditional 4:3 ratio of CRT monitors are expressed, along with dissatisfaction regarding slow response times of LCDs, which can limit gaming performance. Despite these drawbacks, the advantages of LCDs, such as reduced glare and lighter weight, are acknowledged. The discussion also touches on the relevance of frame rates in gaming, emphasizing that while high frame rates are desirable, the human eye can perceive differences in lower ranges.
Doc Brown
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
My current monitor is giving me headaches so I've decided to buy myself a 17" TFT Monitor.

I'm not interested in built-in speakers.

What make/models does everyone recommend, and can anyone give me some links to decent sites with good deals?

These prices seem pretty keen: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/lcd17.html

Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
*off topic*
Ouch, the Value Added Tax is 17.5% !
 
17.5 % is very, very high, I'm glad I don't live in the UK.

As for flat panels, I would recommend anything by NEC, Sony, Samsung and Viewsonic. Sony makes one of the best computer monitors out there as well as Samsung.

Just found this link: Hot Deals
 
Last edited:
I use a flat panel ViewSonic monitor and it's great.

A lot of graphic pros use Viewsonic.
 
I still prefer CRT monitor, the color and resolution are better.
 
The thing that really annoys me about LCD monitors is that all the 17" and 19" monitors come in 5:4 ratio? Why? I have no clue. When every CRT monitor is 4:3, when every 15" and 21" LCD monitor is 4:3, when every standard TV is 4:3. Due to this I refuse to get a 17" and 19" monitor until they decide to produce 4:3 ratio monitors.

Another thing that I dislike about LCD is the slow response time. Current LCD monitors have a response time of 25 mm. Giving a maximum frame rate of 40. What's the point of me having a $500 video card that's pumping 250 fps if my monitor can only show 40? As I'm a big PC game fanatic, this is important.

What I do like about LCD monitors though is that there is no glare. A huge advantage if you're next to a sunny window or lots of artificial lighting. The more obvious advantage of course is weight.
 
BlackVision said:
Another thing that I dislike about LCD is the slow response time. Current LCD monitors have a response time of 25 mm. Giving a maximum frame rate of 40. What's the point of me having a $500 video card that's pumping 250 fps if my monitor can only show 40? As I'm a big PC game fanatic, this is important.

Your eye can't even hande 250 fps and most people who play Doom 3 will get 40 fps.
 
dduardo said:
Your eye can't even hande 250 fps and most people who play Doom 3 will get 40 fps.
That's true. But your eyes can tell the difference between 40 and 100 fps I assure you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
87K
Replies
37
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top