Proving Inequality with e^x: A Step-by-Step Guide

In summary, the textbook hints that i should evaluate the integral \int_{0}^{x}e^udu and then integrate over and over n times, and obtain the upper and lower limits for this integral. However, my problem is with the upper bound of this inequality.
  • #1
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,699
371
i need to prove that:
1+x+x^2/2!+...+x^n/n!<=e^x<=1+x+x^2/2!+...+x^n/n!+(e^x)x^(n+1)/(n+1)! for x>=0
without using the power sum of e^x.

the textbook hints that i should evaluate the integral [tex]\int_{0}^{x}e^udu[/tex] and then i should integrate over and over n times,
and obtain the upper and lower limits for this integral.
i did the first part for the lower limit and i got that:
1+x+x^2/2+...+x^n/n<=e^x
the lhs of the last inequality is ofcourse bigger or equal than 1+x+x^2/2!+...+x^n/n!
my problem is with the upper bound of this inequality.
how to obtain it without using the power sum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Use repeated "integration by parts". In [tex]\int_0^x e^y dy[/tex] (I've changed u to y to be able to use u, v in the integration) let [itex]u= e^y[/itex], [itex]dv= dy[/itex]. One each succeeding integration, let [itex]u= e^y[/itex], dv= whatever function is left times dy.
 
  • #3
but how do i obtain the upper bound?
i already have lower bound, because i have e^x>=0
and thus if i keep integrating i get e^x-1>=0 and again e^x-x-1>=0 and thus up to n times integrating, but as i said this i did already my problem is with the upper bound.
 
  • #4
Have you ever seen a proof of Taylor's theorem (about said series)? In the proof, you derive the first n terms of the Taylor series, plus an exact form for the remainder term (which is then usually approximated using the mean value theorem or something like that to show it goes to 0 as n goes to infinity). Here's one way to derive it for n=2:

[tex]f(x)=f(a) + \int_a^x f'(t) dt[/tex] (1)

[tex]f'(x)=f'(a) + \int_a^x f''(t) dt[/tex] (2)

plug (2) into (1):

[tex]f(x)=f(a) + \int_a^x \left(f'(a) + \int_a^x f''(t') dt' \right) dt[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + \int_a^x \int_a^x f''(t') dt' dt[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
this question shouldn't employ taylor's theorem, cause i still haven't got to it in this book.
 
  • #6
Well the question is dangerously close to proving Taylor's theorem for f(x)=e^x. The proof I mentioned is simple enough that you could be expected to find it yourself without knowing Taylor's theorem, and you should be able to use it to recover those bounds.
 
  • #7
but how do i use it here to get the upper bound?
i mean e^x=1+x+x^2/2!+...+x^n/n!
(but then I am using taylor's theorem)
and thus i get that e^x<=e^x+e^x*x^(n+1)/(n+1)

so i think this question is actually using taylor's theorem in disguise.
 
  • #8
From:

[tex]e^x=1+\int_{0}^{x}e^y dy[/tex]

estimate the integral on the right using the fact that e^x is increasing, and you can get the bound for n=1. You can continue as StatusX has suggested.

I'd suggest induction on n though, you can avoid having to write multiple integrals this way. Just use the above relation and stick in the upper bound for n, you should be able to get the upper bound for n+1 this way.
 
  • #9
but isn't this using taylor's theorem?
by the way the bound for [tex]\int_{0}^{1}e^udu<=e^x[/tex]
 
  • #10
loop quantum gravity said:
but isn't this using taylor's theorem?

Where? Nowhere in my post (or StatusX's for that matter)

loop quantum gravity said:
by the way the bound for [tex]\int_{0}^{1}e^udu<=e^x[/tex]

Do you mean [tex]\int_{0}^{x}e^udu<=e^x[/tex]? If so sure, but will this help you get e^x<=1+x*e^x? Can you think of another way to bound this integral using the fact that e^x is increasing?
 
  • #11
"using Taylor's theorem" would mean saying "e^x = 1+x+x^2/2!+...+R(x), where R(x)=blah due to Taylor's theorem." All you're using is the fundamental theorem of calculus. And the idea I was suggesting for getting the upper bound is to replace:

[tex]\int_0^x dt_1 \int_0^x dt_2 ... \int_0^x dt_n \frac{d^n}{d{t_n}^n} \left(e^{t_n} \right) = \int_0^x dt_1 \int_0^x dt_2 ... \int_0^x dt_n e^{t_n} [/tex]

with something at least as big. The idea that pops out from looking at the bound they want is to replace [itex]e^{t_n}[/itex] by its maximum on the integration range. As shmoe points out, you can clean up the notation here if you use induction instead.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
one thing that i do understand is that i get this [tex]/int_{0}^{x}e^udu+1=e^x[/tex]
and i need to integrate over and over n times, thus i get that:
[tex]e^x=1+\int_{0}^{x}1+\int_{0}^{x}+...\int_{0}^{x}e^ududu'du''...du^n[/tex]
but besides this i dnot know how to get a smaller bound than e^x to this.
btw, shmoe
for e^x<=1+xe^x= 1+x(1+x+...+x^n/n!)=1+x+x^2+...+x^(n+1)/n!
where i need to get 1+x+...+e^x*x^(n+1)/(n+1)!=1+x+...+(x^(n+1)/(n+1)!+...+x^(2n+1)/n!(n+1)!) and I am not sure how exactly to estimate this.
 
  • #13
Look, you've got:

[tex]e^x=1+\int_0^x e^u du[/tex]

and you'd like to show [tex]e^x\leq 1+ x e^x[/tex]. can you see no way to show:

[tex]\int_0^x e^u du\leq xe^x[/tex]

Consider my hint e^x is increasing, draw the graph if necessary, but you should be able to get the last inequalty.

loop quantum gravity said:
btw, shmoe
for e^x<=1+xe^x= 1+x(1+x+...+x^n/n!)

This isn't an equality.
 
  • #14
but i don't understand why i need to get to this inequality
[tex]\int_0^x e^u du\leq xe^x[/tex]
does this show the upper bound here?

edit:
i understand now you also integrate the rhs whilst you integrate n times the given integral.

ok thanks, btw, does my appraoch for the lower bound is correct?
 
  • #15
loop quantum gravity said:
but i don't understand why i need to get to this inequality
[tex]\int_0^x e^u du\leq xe^x[/tex]
does this show the upper bound here?

What I just said. When n=0 you want to show

[tex]e^x\leq 1+xe^x[/tex]

right??

You know:

[tex]e^x=1+\int_0^x e^u du[/tex]

So bounding the integral above by xe^x will get the inequality you are after.
 
  • #16
loop quantum gravity said:
ok thanks, btw, does my appraoch for the lower bound is correct?

It looks like you claim to have proven:

1+x+x^2/2+...+x^n/n<=e^x

if so, this is false, just look at n=3 and x =1. Your bound would imply e>=1+1+1/2+1/3=2.8333...
 

1. What is the purpose of proving inequality using e^x?

The purpose of proving inequality with e^x is to mathematically demonstrate that one quantity is always greater than another quantity. This is commonly used in various fields of science, such as physics, chemistry, and economics.

2. How do you prove inequality using e^x?

The most common method is to use the properties of the exponential function, such as the fact that e^x is always positive and increasing. This can be combined with algebraic manipulation and the use of limits to show that one quantity is always greater than the other.

3. Can e^x be used to prove both strict and non-strict inequalities?

Yes, e^x can be used to prove both strict (>) and non-strict (≥) inequalities. This is because the exponential function is continuous and has no breaks or jumps, allowing for a smooth transition between values.

4. Are there any limitations to using e^x to prove inequality?

One limitation is that the inequality must involve exponential functions. Additionally, this method may not work for all types of inequalities, especially those involving trigonometric or logarithmic functions.

5. Can proving inequality with e^x be applied to real-life situations?

Yes, proving inequality using e^x can be applied to many real-life situations, such as comparing the growth rates of populations or predicting economic trends. It is a powerful tool for analyzing and understanding various phenomena in the world around us.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
247
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
665
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
535
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
706
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
258
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
308
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
690
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
705
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
276
Back
Top