Inertail versus gravitational mass

AI Thread Summary
Inertial mass is defined as the resistance to changes in motion, while gravitational mass is the force that attracts objects to one another. Experiments have confirmed that these two types of mass are equivalent, despite their differing roles in motion. The discussion raises the idea that mass could be viewed as a resistance to a natural scattering motion of objects, but this perspective does not resolve the inherent contradiction of mass both resisting and causing motion. Ultimately, the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass enhances the understanding of gravitational laws. The relationship between these two concepts is fundamental to physics.
johnxxx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Inertial mass can be understood as the resistance to change motion. Gravitational mass exerts a pull on every other object (and as a result of action-reaction force law also on itself). It has been shown by experiment that both mass concepts are the same. But it looks strange that one quantity is a resistance to motion and cause of motion at the same time.

Would it not be more logical to assume that there exists a natural motion of scattering all things and that mass is a reverse motion (a kind of friction) that resists this natural motion of scattering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it wouldn't.

For one thing, your version of mass still has the same problem, that mass is both stopping the object from moving, yet causing other objects to move.

In fact, that gravitational and inertial mass is the same makes the laws of gravity really cool
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Gravitational and Inertial Masss
Replies
4
Views
2K
Does the mass of an object affect its inertia?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Gravitational forces, speeds and masses
Replies
11
Views
2K
Finding the time it takes for two stacked blocks to travel
Replies
18
Views
3K
Two masses attached by a rod orbiting around the Earth
Replies
4
Views
2K
Relationship between material mass and weight
Replies
5
Views
2K
I How to prove gravitational mass & inertial mass equivalence?
Replies
11
Views
3K
Foucault Pendulum at the North Pole
Replies
9
Views
2K
What is the relationship between tension and mass in a system with friction?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Nature of Collision in Compton Scattering
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top