Inertia Q: Which Frame of Ref Is Inertial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter endaman95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
An inertial frame of reference is defined as one that is not accelerating, meaning it does not change speed or direction. The discussion evaluates two frames: one fixed to the Sun and another to a laboratory table. While the Sun and stars are in motion and technically not inertial, they can be approximated as such for practical purposes. The laboratory table is considered a better inertial frame due to its stable position. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding inertial frames in physics while encouraging independent problem-solving.
endaman95
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following is an inertial frame of reference when the measuring sensitivity in not very high?
1. A frame of reference fixed to the Sun and its axes are pointing toward 3 other stars.
2.A frame of reference fixed to a laboratory table.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Im not sure about the sun. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my understanding of what is meant by an inertial reference frame:

An inertial reference frame is one that is not accelerating, meaning it is not changing speed or direction.

All frames of reference are, at best, approximations to an inertial reference frame. The sun and the stars in the universe are not fixed and are all moving and accelerating. However, for practical purposes we can assume the Earth and the sun are good enough approximations to an inertial reference frame that we can usually ignore the small inertial forces associated with their movement.
 
I was thinking the same thing. Thank you for the answer.
 
paisiello2 said:
Here is my understanding of what is meant by an inertial reference frame:

An inertial reference frame is one that is not accelerating, meaning it is not changing speed or direction.

All frames of reference are, at best, approximations to an inertial reference frame. The sun and the stars in the universe are not fixed and are all moving and accelerating. However, for practical purposes we can assume the Earth and the sun are good enough approximations to an inertial reference frame that we can usually ignore the small inertial forces associated with their movement.

Please remember not to do the student's homework for them. It is okay to provide hints, ask questions, suggest search terms, etc. But the student must do the bulk of the work on their schoolwork questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top