Infinite solenoid with magnetic flux

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the quantum mechanical behavior of an electron near an infinite solenoid with magnetic flux \Phi. It explains that the electron's motion remains unchanged from that in a zero-flux scenario when \Phi is quantized, specifically as \Phi = n \Phi_{o}, where n is an integer and \Phi_{o} is the fundamental magnetic flux unit. This phenomenon is linked to the Bohm-Aharonov effect and highlights the gauge invariance of the magnetic field, which influences the Hamiltonian through the magnetic vector potential rather than the field itself. The quantization condition indicates that only specific values of magnetic flux allow the electron's motion to mimic that of a zero-flux environment. Understanding this concept is essential for grasping the implications of magnetic flux quantization in quantum mechanics.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question as follows.

For an infinite solenoid with magnetic flux \Phi, for what values of \Phi "is the quantum mechanical motion of an electron constrained to stray far from the solenoid exactly the same as it would be if \Phi were zero"?

Solution:
\Phi = n \Phi_{o} with n = integer and \Phi_{o} = \frac{h c}{e}

Can someone please explain the solution? I don't understand the concepts involved here. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yxgao said:
Hi,
I have a question as follows.


For an infinite solenoid with magnetic flux \Phi, for what values of \Phi "is the quantum mechanical motion of an electron constrained to stray far from the solenoid exactly the same as it would be if \Phi were zero"?

Solution:
\Phi = n \Phi_{o} with n = integer and \Phi_{o} = \frac{h c}{e}

Can someone please explain the solution? I don't understand the concepts involved here. Thanks.

It deals with the famous Bohm-Aharonov effect and magnetic fkux quantization in superconductors.The trick is to exploit the fact that the magetic field is gauge invariant and in the Hamiltonian it enters not through the field,but through the magnetic vector potential.

A nice discussion is made here:
http://hep.ucsd.edu/~branson/130/130b/130b_notes_prod/node50.html
This is node 50,read node 51 as well.

Daniel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


The solution given is related to the quantum mechanical concept of quantization, which states that certain physical quantities can only take on discrete values. In this case, the magnetic flux \Phi is quantized, meaning it can only have certain values determined by the integer n and the fundamental magnetic flux unit \Phi_{o}. This is known as the flux quantization condition.

Now, for an electron moving in the presence of an infinite solenoid, its motion is affected by the magnetic field created by the solenoid. When the magnetic flux \Phi is equal to zero, there is no magnetic field and thus the electron's motion is not affected by it. This is why the quantum mechanical motion is the same as if \Phi were zero.

However, when \Phi is not equal to zero, the electron's motion is constrained by the magnetic field and it can only take on certain discrete values determined by the quantization condition. So, for the electron's motion to be exactly the same as if \Phi were zero, the magnetic flux must be a multiple of the fundamental unit \Phi_{o}.

In summary, the solution is saying that for the quantum mechanical motion of an electron to be unaffected by the magnetic field of an infinite solenoid, the magnetic flux must be quantized, with values determined by the quantization condition.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top