Infinite square well eignefunctions

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


The eignefunctions for a infinite square well potential are of the form

\psi_n} (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \frac{n\pi x}{a}.

Suppose a particle in this potnetial has an initial normalized wavefunction of the form
\Psi(x,0)= A\left(\sin \frac{\pi x}{a}\right)^5

What is the form of Psi(x,t)

2. The attempt at a solution
Now the given wavefunction Psi(x,0) can be made to fit the infinite square well by making it a superposition

\Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=1} c_{n} \psi_{n} (x) e^{iE_{n}t/\hbar}

is that it?

it cnat be that simple...

thanks for your advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:

Homework Statement


The eignefunctions for a infinite square well potential are of the form

\psi_n} (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \frac{n\pi x}{a}.

Suppose a particle in this potnetial has an initial normalized wavefunction of the form
\Psi(x,0)= A\left(\sin \frac{\pi x}{a}\right)^5

What is the form of Psi(x,t)

2. The attempt at a solution
Now the given wavefunction Psi(x,0) can be made to fit the infinite square well by making it a superposition

\Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=1} c_{n} \psi_{n} (x) e^{iE_{n}t/\hbar}

is that it?

it cnat be that simple...

thanks for your advice
yes. Just use a table of trig identities to write sin to the fifth power as a sum of sine functions of different arguments. That will directly give you the expansion in terms of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian.

patrick
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top