Infinite Square Well - Particle in linear combination of states

galactic
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
A particle of mass m is trapped in a one-dimensional infinite square well running from x= -L/2 to L/2. The particle is in a linear combination of its ground state and first excited state such that its expectation value of momentum takes on its largest possible value at t=0.I know the process of solving PDE's clear as day, that's not the issue. The problem is that I'm tripping myself out on how to write \Psi(x,t) as a linear combination of its ground state + first excited state.

My hunch is to approach the problem like this :

\Psi(x,t)=c_{0}\Psi_{0}(x,t)+c_{1}\Psi_{1}(x,t)

where 0 and 1 represent the ground state and first state, respectively

I'm confusing myself on what needs to fill in the equations! Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The clever answer is that this problem is ill-posed, because strictly speaking a particle in an infinite-square well has no momentum observable, but I'm pretty sure that this is not what the professor wants to know ;-).

So guess you are supposed to find c_0 and c_1 such that the naive "momentum"-expectation value
\int_{-L/2}^{L/2} \mathrm{d} x \; \psi^*(x,t) \left (-\hbar \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} \psi(x,t) \right )=\text{max},
where \psi must be properly normalized, i.e.,
\int_{-L/2}^{L/2} \mathrm{d} x \; |\psi(x,t)|^2=0.
 
vanhees71 said:
The clever answer is that this problem is ill-posed, because strictly speaking a particle in an infinite-square well has no momentum observable, but I'm pretty sure that this is not what the professor wants to know ;-).

So guess you are supposed to find c_0 and c_1 such that the naive "momentum"-expectation value
\int_{-L/2}^{L/2} \mathrm{d} x \; \psi^*(x,t) \left (-\hbar \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} x} \psi(x,t) \right )=\text{max},
where \psi must be properly normalized, i.e.,
\int_{-L/2}^{L/2} \mathrm{d} x \; |\psi(x,t)|^2=0.

thanks! that makes sense. By the way, the problem wants me to find the nomalized ψ(x,t) and the usual dynamical quantities (<x>, <p>, check m(d/dx)<x>=p, Δx, Δp, check ΔxΔp satisfies uncertainty principle)

how do we write ψ(x,t) as a linear combination of its ground and first excited state like the problem asks??
 
Last edited:
Just like you did in the original post.
 
I'm stuck on the fact that were given the phrase "expectation value of the momentum is a maximum when t=0."

the energy of the second state is higher than that of the first, which implies the momentum of the second state which is more than that in the first (ps- I'm just talking about expectation values)

Does anyone know what this means ?
 
Still confused about that phrase, if anyone has ideas please let me know ! Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top