Infinite square well with delta potential

dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have infinite square well which has a potential V(x)=\frac{\hbar^2}{m}\Omega\delta(x) in x=0, and is 0 in the interval x\in[-a,a]

Homework Equations


Schrodinger eq.

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved the time independant Schrodinger eq. by integration around x=0 by some small parameter \varepsilon. And I got the discontinuity

u'(+0)-u'(-0)=2\Omega u(0)

Where u(x) is the \psi(x). Now I also have a discontinuity in logarithmic derivative:
\frac{u'(+0)}{u(0)}-\frac{u'(-0)}{u(0)}=2\Omega.

I solved the infinite square well problem and the solutions can be divided into symmetric and antisymmetric ones:

u_n^+(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}\cos(k_n x), n=\pm 1,\pm 3,\ldots
u_n^-(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}\sin(k_n x), n=\pm 2,\pm 4,\ldots

And k_n=\frac{n\pi}{2a}.

The odd solutions have knot in x=0 and their derivative is continuous in x=0, but even ones must have this form:

u_n^+(x)=-A\sin k_n^+(x+a),\ for\quad -a\leq x<0 and
u_n^+(x)=A\sin k_n^+(x-a),\ for\quad 0<x\leq a

Now I have to apply the derivation condition on this solutions (discontinuity one). Now I'm puzzled here. In my notes it says:
2Ak_n^+\cos(k_n^+ a)=-2\Omega A\sin(k_n^+a)

And right hand side I got, but what about the left?!

If I derive the whole thing (the sin) I get:

u_n^+'(x)=-Ak_n^+\cos k_n^+(x+a),\ for\quad -a\leq x<0 and
u_n^+'(x)=Ak_n^+\cos k_n^+(x-a),\ for\quad 0<x\leq a

And if I let x=0, those two would cancel :\ Or do I have to look separately from +0 and -0? I'm kinda stuck there...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I solved the problem, I should first consider the solutions with separate constants, let's say A and B, and then apply the continuity at x=0 condition...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top