Inflate aluminium tube to increase it’s strength?

AI Thread Summary
Pressurizing a thin-walled aluminum tube can enhance its axial compression strength but may increase hoop stresses to dangerous levels, risking rupture. Structural integrity depends on the loading conditions and the balance between axial and hoop stresses. Increasing the wall thickness is recommended for better strength, even if it adds weight. Alternative design strategies include using multiple thin tubes, pre-stressing materials, and innovative shapes to reduce weight while maintaining strength. Overall, careful consideration of material properties and stress analysis is crucial for safe design in human-powered helicopters.
swerdna
Messages
251
Reaction score
0
I’m designing and hope to build a human powered helicopter (HPH) and am wondering if pressurising a thin walled aluminium tube by filling it with compressed air would strengthen it’s structural properties.

Hope this is the right place to post this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Good luck with the HPH. Here's a place to start when considering pressure.

e.g. consider the tension on the tubing's wall.

lapb.jpg
 
dlgoff said:
Good luck with the HPH. Here's a place to start when considering pressure.

e.g. consider the tension on the tubing's wall.

lapb.jpg

Thanks.
 
Also, it will depend on the loading on the beam. Pressurizing the thin walled tube induces axial and hoop stresses. Thus you increase it's compression strength in the axial direction, but be very careful that the hoop stresses are not increased so much that you exceed the yield strength causing rupture.

From a stress analysis and fracture mechanics perspective, I would be much more inclined to increase the thickness of the tube walls, even if it increases the weight. Ideally, you can fit several thin tubes inside each other, in order to prevent brittle fracture (which would be veeery bad for you application)
 
Thanks. I agree that pressurising aluminium tubes probably isn’t the best method. I’m working on other methods that include pre-stressing styrene foam, cable-staying and creating an inverted conical shape with the wing spars and tying them together with multiple lines like a spider‘s web. Overall I’m trying to reduce the weight of the wing spars I use.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top