Information on first planets formed in the universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the timeline for the formation of the first planets in the universe, highlighting that supernovae are essential for creating heavy elements necessary for rocky planets like Earth and Mars. It raises the question of whether gas giants also require these elements for their formation. The impact of first-generation stars, which were larger, on the size and composition of planets is also considered. The conversation suggests that pure gas giants could form alongside the first stars, but brown dwarfs may not survive due to supernova explosions. Overall, the dialogue aims to clarify the early development of star and planetary formation in the universe.
Cosmo Novice
Messages
367
Reaction score
3
Can anyone give me a rough idea of a timescale for first planets in the Universe?

I understand that supernovae are required for heavy elements for rocky planets such as Mars or earth, but was wondering if this same requirements would hold for gas giants?

Just trying to establish the most likely oldest planetary world types. Also were the first generation stars supposed to be larger so would this effect planetary size and composition?

I am just trying to get a clearer image of the early development of star and planetary formation so apologies my questions are not particularly well formed. I am mainly looking to extend my mental image of expansion and development of the early matter U.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
IMHO, you would get a range of 'pure' gas-giants formed along with the first stars. However, the 'Brown Dwarf' variety might not get a chance to burn through their lithium before they were blasted by nearby supernovae. Without rocky cores, even they'd just evaporate...
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top