Initial Mass Function physics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around understanding the initial mass function (IMF) in astrophysics, specifically for a globular cluster with a given IMF equation and total mass. The participants clarify that the units involved are solar masses, with a minimum and maximum stellar mass range provided. To find the constant 'a' in the IMF equation, integration of the mass distribution is necessary, leading to a formula that relates 'a' to the total mass of the cluster. The logic behind including mass in the integral is explained as a means to calculate the total mass from the number distribution of stars. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding distribution functions in astrophysical contexts.
cluckaluck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am having a lot of trouble understanding exactly what the initial mass function is.
I have a problem in which I am given the IMF for a globular cluster of stars, dN/dm=am^(-2.35) and the total mass of the cluster, 10^6 solar masses, and asked to find the constant a. Could someone help me with this as well as describe what units are involved with IMF's and integrating them? Thank you so much.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi

Well units is easy because you've already used "solar masses" - which is the mass of the Sun. The minimum stellar mass is ~0.08 solar masses and the maximum is ~150 solar masses, at least for current metallicity levels.

Now total number for a given IMF is a bit trickier. You know the number distribution for a given mass range - that's the IMF - and you integrate that for the total number. In the range I gave it's then Q = (30.256/1.35)*a/(Msol^1.35), which doesn't readily translate into a number, but allows you to work out relative numbers in different mass ranges.

But notice the ratio a/(Msol^1.35.) If we take Msol to be 1, then for a given number of stars, Q, working out a is obvious, a = Q/22.4.

Let's find the total mass. The integral becomes a*S [the integral 'long S'] M*M^(-2.35) dM, thus total mass of stars, m, across the previous mass range is (2.24/0.35)*a/(Msol^0.35), or (6.42*a) solar masses. Thus a is 1,000,000/6.42 (Msol^1.35) for the example you give. Note the unit.
 
Thanks for your help. I understand almost all it, but I not how you found the total mass. Why did you insert another M into the integral? It comes out to the right answer, but I don't understand the logic behind it. Thanks again.
 
Hi cluckaluck

Isn't it obvious? The distribution function tells you how many objects of a given mass, so you multiply by that mass to get how much mass there is. Think about it. Took me a while, but it made sense eventually. I had to read a text about distribution functions to really understand what was going on.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top