Initial upward acceleration in a pulley problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a pulley problem involving a worker who experiences an unexpected upward acceleration while lowering bricks in a barrel. The worker's mass is 74.2 kg, and the combined mass of the bricks and barrel is 151.5 kg, leading to a net force calculation of 757.54 N. The worker incorrectly calculates the initial upward acceleration as 10.209 m/s², which is identified as incorrect, indicating a need for reevaluation. The height of the building and the time it takes for the worker to hit the ground after starting his descent are also key questions posed. The thread emphasizes the importance of applying physics concepts correctly to solve real-life scenarios.
NinjaPenguin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given data:

Gravity= 9.8 m/s2
Mass of bricks= 136 kg
Mass of barrel= 15.5 kg
Mass of barrel and bricks= 151.5 kg
Mass of worker= 74.2 kg
Time= 2.95s

The problem

The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 .
To emphasize the fact that lessons learned in 303K carry over into real life, this problem is based on an accident report from the Worker’s Compensation Board in Bryant, Texas.

Dear Sir/Madam:
I am writing in response to your request for a fuller explanation on the cause of my accident. I trust the following details will be sufficient. On the day of the accident, I was working alone laying bricks on the roof of a new building. On completing my work, I had some bricks left over which were found to have a mass of 136 kg. Rather than carry the bricks down by hand, I decided to lower them in a barrel with a mass of 15.5 kg by using a pulley which was attached to the side
of the building at the roof.

Securing the rope at ground level, I went up to the roof, swung the barrel out and loaded the bricks into it. Then I went down and untied the rope, holding it tightly to insure a slow descent of
the bricks. You will note that my mass is 74.2 kg. To my surprise, I was jerked off the ground suddenly and forgot to let go of the rope. Needless to say, I proceeded at a rapid rate up towards the roof of the building. Somewhere up the building, I met the barrel which was now proceeding downward at an equally impressive speed. This did not slow me down and I continued my rapid ascent, hitting the pulley on the top floor. I estimate that all this happened in the matter of 2.95 s.
At the same time, however, the barrel of bricks hit the ground and the bottom fell out of the
barrel. Devoid of the bricks, the barrel now had a mass of 15.5 kg. I refer you again to my mass. As you might imagine, I began a rapid descent down the side of the building and met the barrel coming up.

My luck finally began to change slightly. The barrel slowed me enough to lessen my injuries when I fell into the pile of bricks. I am sorry to report, however, as I lay there on the pile of bricks, in
pain, unable to move and watching the empty barrel several stories above me, I again lost
my composure and let go of the rope.

1. What was the initial upward acceleration
experienced by the worker?
Answer in units of m/s2.

2. What is the height of the building?
Answer in units of m.

3. How many seconds did it take (after starting
his descent) for the worker to hit the ground?
Answer in units of s.

Homework Equations



F=ma

x = vot + 1/2at*2

The Attempt at a Solution



1.
I tried finding the sum of the force up and down.
Force up = 151.5 (9.8)= 1484.7 N
Force down = 74.2(9.8)= 727.16 N

Then I subtracted up force from the down force to get the net.

1484.7 - 727.16 = 757.54 N

I then used F =ma to find a.

757.54 = 74.2a
757.54/74.2 = 10.209 = a

For 2
I would just plug in time(2.95) and the acceleration to find the height

For 3
I would plug in height and (9.8 m/s2) to find time

My answer of 10.209 m/s2 is not right though so I can't do the other two. Any help would be appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you. For some reason I didn't even think about that and we just did a lab on it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top