Initial Velocity - Projectile Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the initial velocity of a firework shell that explodes at a height of 600 ft after approximately 5 seconds. The user has attempted to use kinematic equations to derive the initial velocity but seeks clarification on the calculations and the impact of air resistance. It is confirmed that the first equation can determine the vertical component of velocity, but the horizontal component cannot be calculated with the given data. The user also expresses interest in incorporating air resistance into their calculations for greater accuracy. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities involved in projectile motion and the need for precise calculations in such scenarios.
vaio23
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My end goal is to calculate the vertical and horizontal displacement of an object that explodes in the air e.g. a firework. However, I am having difficulty deriving the initial velocity of the object. I know the approximate time is 5.0 seconds from the ground to explosion and the height is 600 ft (182.88m).

So far I have used the equations v(i) = (d / t) - [(a * t) / 2] and V(i) = a*t. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial velocity to fire is the same as the velocity an object would be traveling at after falling from its peak altitude.

Formulas and calculator can be found here:
http://www.gravitycalc.com/

If the time is 5 seconds, the altitude would be 123 meters and the initial velocity would be 49 meters/second.

If the altitude is 183 meters, the time is 6.1 seconds at an initial velocity of 59 meters/second.
 
The 600 ft (182.88m) is the height in which the fireworks breaks and we do know from industry averages that a shell of this size takes 5.0 seconds to reach this height. It is likely that the maximum height is greater than 600 ft which would mean the shell still has a final velocity at the time of break. Is there a way to calculate for these two unknowns?
 
vaio23 said:
So far I have used the equations v(i) = (d / t) - [(a * t) / 2] and V(i) = a*t. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The first equation is fine. That will tell you the initial velocity (vertical component only) which will allow the projectile to reach a given height in a given time. Note that this neglects air resistance, which may well be significant.

There's no way to determine the horizontal component of velocity from the given data.
 
Thank you for your response it was a big help. If I wanted to become more precise and incorporate air resistance into my formula how would I do this. It was been a long time since I've done something like this.

Known Values:
Time = 3.8
Aprox Height = 300 Ft
Initial velocity = 140 Ft/s
Launch Angle = 75 Degrees
Weight of shell = 3.5 lbs
Also, the radius of the sphere is 3 inches
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top