MHB Initial vertical velocity (vertical motion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for the height of a cricket that jumps with an initial vertical velocity of 4 ft per second. The relevant formula to use is y = y0 + v0y*t - 16t^2, where y0 is the initial height and v0y is the initial vertical velocity. Participants are encouraged to use this formula to write the height function and determine when the cricket lands back on the ground. The conversation emphasizes understanding the application of the formula rather than solving the problem outright. This approach aids in grasping vertical motion concepts in physics.
averyjedwards2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi there! i can't quite recall the formula for vertical velocity and who to easily factor the polynomials. Help anyone?
here's my example problem:
A cricket jumps off the ground with an initial vertical velocity of 4 ft per second.
A. write an equation that gives the height (in feet) of the cricket as a function of the time (in seconds) since it jumps.
B. after how many seconds does the cricket land on the ground?

thank you! i don't want you to necessarily solve this for me, i just need a little bit of a prompt with how to solve this! thanks so much!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So you can use $y=y_0+v_{0y}t-16t^2$, where $y_0$ is the initial height, and $v_{0y}$ is the initial velocity in the $y$ direction. Can you proceed from here?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top