Inner and Outer Radius of a Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter jumbogala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the charge density and the charge enclosed in a Gaussian sphere for a hollow sphere with inner radius x and outer radius y, uniformly charged with 5 C. The charge density is determined by dividing the total charge by the volume of the spherical shell, which is found by subtracting the volume of the inner sphere from the volume of the outer sphere. Participants clarify that the Gaussian sphere's radius must be between x and y, and not equal to y. The final calculations involve determining the volume of the Gaussian sphere and multiplying it by the charge density to find the enclosed charge. The conversation emphasizes understanding the geometry of the hollow sphere and the correct application of volume formulas.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A sphere, which is hollow, has an inner radius (denoted x) and an outer radius (denoted y).

The sphere does not conduct.

It has a charge of 5 C distributed uniformly throughout it.

1) What is the charge density by volume in the body of the hollow sphere?

2) How much charge is enclosed in a gaussian sphere of radius x < r < y?


Homework Equations


(4/3)(pi)(r3) is the volume of a sphere with radius r.


The Attempt at a Solution



I know you divide the charge by the volume of the sphere. Since the sphere is hollow, can you assume that the 5 C of charge are distributed in the hollow part too, or only on the edge?

My instinct is to calculate the volume using radius y, but I'm not sure.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jumbogala said:

Homework Statement


A sphere, which is hollow, has an inner radius (denoted x) and an outer radius (denoted y).

The sphere does not conduct.

It has a charge of 5 C distributed uniformly throughout it.

1) What is the charge density by volume in the body of the hollow sphere?

2) How much charge is enclosed in a gaussian sphere of radius x < r < y?


Homework Equations


(4/3)(pi)(r3) is the volume of a sphere with radius r.


The Attempt at a Solution



I know you divide the charge by the volume of the sphere. Since the sphere is hollow, can you assume that the 5 C of charge are distributed in the hollow part too, or only on the edge?

My instinct is to calculate the volume using radius y, but I'm not sure.

The wording of this problem is a trifle confusing. Here is what I think: You have a spherical shell of inner radius x and outer radius y. The sphere is empty for r < x. The charge is uniformly distributed throughout the material that makes up the spherical shell. You can figure the volume of the shell by subtracting the volume of the empty interior portion from the volume of the whole sphere (i.e. use r = y in the volume formula) From that you can get an expression for the charge density (Charge/Volume). I see you don't have to calculate E, but just need the charge enclosed in a Gaussian sphere inside the shell. So calculate the volume of material enclosed in the Gaussian sphere the same way as you calculated the volume of the spherical shell, it's just that now your outer radius is the radius of your Gaussian sphere. Multiply that by the charge density and you're done. Don't be alarmed if the final answer is messy.
 
Okay, I think I understand what you mean.

Volume of the empty part of the sphere:
(4/3)(pi)(x^3)

Volume of the entire sphere:
(4/3)(pi)(y^3)

Subract entire sphere from empty part...
(4/3)(pi)(y^3) - (4/3)(pi)(x^3) = volume of the shell only

Divide 5 by volume of shell only, to get charge density.

At this point I get a bit confused. I understand that I need to find the volume of the Gaussian sphere, then multiply by charge density. But the Gaussian sphere has to have a radius that is less than y, so why does y become the radius of the Gaussian sphere?
 
Last edited:
jumbogala said:
Okay, I think I understand what you mean.

Volume of the empty part of the sphere:
(4/3)(pi)(x^3)

Volume of the entire sphere:
(4/3)(pi)(y^3)

Subract entire sphere from empty part...
(4/3)(pi)(y^3) - (4/3)(pi)(x^3) = volume of the shell only

Divide 5 by volume of shell only, to get charge density.

At this point I get a bit confused. I understand that I need to find the volume of the Gaussian sphere, then multiply by charge density. But the Gaussian sphere has to have a radius that is less than y, so why does y become the radius of the Gaussian sphere?

Somewhere we mis-communicated. Your are right, the radius of the Gaussian sphere is NOT y. Call it r where x< r < y.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top