Inner Product of 0 vector, & Complex numbers

DeepSeeded
Messages
113
Reaction score
1
Hello,

Can someone help me understand why the Inner Product of a Null vector with itself can be non zero if complex numbers are involved?

And why using the complex conjugate resolved this?

I may have understood this wrong. It could be that an Inner Product of any non-Null vector with itself can be zero if complex numbers are involved. Either way does someone have an example?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It cannot. The inner product of the null vector with itself is zero, and the inner product of a non-null vector cannot be zero. Both these facts follow from the following axiom for inner products:
\langle v|v \rangle \geq 0, and \langle v|v \rangle = 0 if and only if v = |0\rangle​
 
The inner product on a vector space over the complex numbers must satisfy
<u, v>= \overline{<v, u>} and, in particular, <u, av>= \overline{a}<u, v> for any scalar a.

For C2, ordered pairs of complex numbers, the inner product <(a+ bi),(a+ bi)> = (a+ bi)\overline(a+ bi)= (a+bi)(a-bi)= a^2+ b^2 which is 0 only if a= b= 0.

If you mistakenly use the inner product for real numbers, that is, without the "complex conjugation" you could have <a+ bi, a+ bi>= a^- b^2 which can be 0. But, as I said, that is a mistake.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The inner product on a vector space over the complex numbers must satisfy
<u, v>= \overline{<v, u>} and, in particular, <u, av>= \overline{a}<u, v> for any scalar a.

For C2, ordered pairs of complex numbers, the inner product <(a+ bi),(a+ bi)> = (a+ bi)\overline(a+ bi)= (a+bi)(a-bi)= a^2+ b^2 which is 0 only if a= b= 0.

If you mistakenly use the inner product for real numbers, that is, without the "complex conjugation" you could have <a+ bi, a+ bi>= a^- b^2 which can be 0. But, as I said, that is a mistake.

Ahha! Thank you!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top