Inner Product Spaces of 2x2 Matrix

abbasb
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that <U,V> = u1.v1 + u2.v3 + u2.v3 + u4.v4 is NOT an inner product on M2x2

Homework Equations


U: row 1 = [u1 u2] row 2 = [u3 u4] V: row 1 = [v1 v2] row 2 = [v3 v4]

The Attempt at a Solution



As I went through each of the axioms, I found that they were all correct (at least the way I did it), I've been stuck for quite some time now. I found that the symmetry axiom, additivity axiom and homogeneity axiom all remained true. So I'm assuming the positivity axiom doesn't hold true, I'm just confused as how to show this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abbasb said:

Homework Statement



Show that <U,V> = u1.v1 + u2.v3 + u2.v3 + u4.v4 is NOT an inner product on M2x2

Your formula looks like it might have a typo, with u2.v3 appearing twice. Is that how the problem is worded?
abbasb said:

Homework Equations


U: row 1 = [u1 u2] row 2 = [u3 u4] V: row 1 = [v1 v2] row 2 = [v3 v4]

The Attempt at a Solution



As I went through each of the axioms, I found that they were all correct (at least the way I did it), I've been stuck for quite some time now. I found that the symmetry axiom, additivity axiom and homogeneity axiom all remained true. So I'm assuming the positivity axiom doesn't hold true, I'm just confused as how to show this.
 
Sorry, its supposed to be <U,V> = u1.v1 + u2.v3 + u3.v2 + u4.v4

and U and V are supposed to be matrices...couldn't find a better way to show them as so.
 
I'm leaning toward the positivity thing, too. Can you come up with a 2x2 matrix U for which <U, U> = u12 + u2u3 + u3u2 + u42 < 0? Try playing around with a mix of positive and negative numbers for which the sume of u2u3 and u3u2 is more negative than the two squared terms are positive.
 
Last edited:
Mark44 said:
I'm leaning toward the positivity thing, too. Can you come up with a 2x2 matrix U for which <U, U> = u12 + u2u3 + u3u2 + u22 < 0? Try playing around with a mix of positive and negative numbers for which the sume of u2u3 and u3u2 is more negative than the two squared terms are positive.

But shouldn't I be looking for a 2x2 matrix such that <U,U> = u1^2 + 2(u2.u3) + u4^2 < 0? And the only way I could find such a matrix is through trial and error?
 
abbasb said:
But shouldn't I be looking for a 2x2 matrix such that <U,U> = u1^2 + 2(u2.u3) + u4^2 < 0? And the only way I could find such a matrix is through trial and error?
First question: yes. u12 and u42 are always going to be nonnegative, so can you fiddle with values of u2 and u3 so that 2u2u3 is more negative than the two squared terms are positive?
Second question: Yes, but using judicious trial and error. You're only dealing with 2x2 matrices, and you can start with 1s in the main diagonal positions. That leaves you only two other positions to fill in.

BTW, I edited my previous post to fix a subscript.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top