Inner-radius of a (convex) polygon

  • Thread starter Thread starter NaturePaper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convex Polygon
NaturePaper
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I want to know whether it is correct that every convex polygon has an inner-circle (& hence an inner-radius). I think it is only possible for triangle and for regular polygon. Am I right?

If there is any convex N-gon having sides a_1,a_2,...,a_N which has an incircle, then what is the formula for the inner-radius in terms of the sides?


Regards,
NaturePaper
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you draw a circle inside the convex polygon, it is not necessary that the circle will touch all the sides.
 
then..??
 
So Radius and center of the circle will differ with respect to the side you wish to touch with the circle. then what is the use of finding radius?
 
@KnowPhysics,
I think I'm missing something.

It is well known that for a triangle with sides a_1, a_2, a_3 there is a (unique) circle inscribed
in the triangle whose radius R is given by some formula involving the sides a_i's.

My question was what about the general situation, i,e for any convex N-gon what will be the situation?

Regards,
NaturePaper
 
i explained already, it is not necessary that the circle will touch all the sides. So Radius and center of the circle will differ with respect to the side you wish to touch with the circle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top