Inrush in Transformer at no load

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel Fuente
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Transformer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simulating inrush current in a transformer at no load using Powerfactory software. The user observes that while the magnetization current aligns with expectations, the phase current appears smaller than the magnetization current, leading to confusion. Clarification is sought on the difference between magnetization current and phase current, particularly in a no-load scenario. It is noted that the simulation does not represent true inrush current due to the absence of a connection event. Understanding these current types is crucial for accurate transformer analysis.
Daniel Fuente
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to simulate the inrush current in a transformer when it is at no load, using the software Powerfactory.

I get the Magnetization current, and it is what I was expecting.
But I get confused when I draw the phase current, because as the trafo is at no load... should not be the same the magnetization current and the phase current?

How is possible that the phase current is smaller than the magnetization current?
I don´t understand that.

Someone can help?


Thanks everyone
 

Attachments

  • EMT_MagnetizationReactance.jpg
    EMT_MagnetizationReactance.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 601
  • dudapf.jpg
    dudapf.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 546
Engineering news on Phys.org
The picture is the simulation of the normal operation with no load.
That is not really the inrush current becouse there is no connection event.
The thing is that I don´t understand what exactly is the difference between the magnetization current and the phase current.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top