Instrument amplifier or just operational amplifier?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing an ECG system and whether to use an instrumentation amplifier or operational amplifier. The supervisor suggests amplifying each lead separately and processing the signals in MATLAB to derive I, II, and III signals. Key safety considerations are emphasized, including the need for isolation and protection against high voltage from defibrillators to prevent harm to patients. It is recommended to run both methods in parallel for comparison and to ensure compliance with safety standards like UL601 and UL544. Proper filtering and transient protection are also crucial to safeguard the input lines and amplifiers from induced voltages.
mamod
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi:
i have a project to design ECG system:
read ECG signal by using (DAQ)data aquestion and the Signal processing(bandpass& notch filter) will be done by using MATLAB program.

I was Intended to use instrument amplifier to obtain I,II or III signals
as this figure:

ecg_chain.jpg


but my supervisor told me:
amplify each lead separately (LA,RA or LL , and RL as reference) and read it by DAQ
then inside MATLAB we can obtain I,II and III signals, mathematically according to these equations:
I=LA-RA,II=LL-RA and III=LL-LA

so,what's your opinion about this method(of my supervisor), can succeed??
should i use instrument amplifier or just operational amplifier?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd use instrumentation amplifiers.

You're probably aware of the lessons learned in late 60's by early medical instrument manufacturers, but i'll mention two of them just in caes...

1. If your machine is connected to a patient who is also connected to one of those defibrillators with the high voltage paddles to get a stopped heart going, it's apt to fry your input amplifiers. Provide protection.

2. Isolate all your input leads, even the "common", from the electronic amplifiers by at least a megohm and preferably ten.
Reason is an electrical fault inside your machine must not reach out and touch the patient.
That's the reason hospitals have separate grounds for instuments and , say, vacuum cleaners. You don't want a defective vacuum cleaner to electrocute a patient through your ECG machine.

Analog Devices was a leader in developing isolated op-amps for the medical instrument industry. Their Peter Zicko was at the forefront back around 1973.
Intronics is another name brand, do some searching on "isolated input amplifier"

end of nagging


old jim
 
thank you "jim hardy"
 
Tough call.

Whatever the boss is, he's always the boss. It's generally better to gather evidence than argue.

Time allowing, I'd run both methods in parallel. Then, give a short effort towards the op amp method, record some notes regarding it's behavior, and then, if neccesary use your fall back circuit.

If your manager wants to commercialize this circuit, he'll have to deal with UL601 or equivalent. No repectable hospital or clinic will allow your device in without the precious safety agency sticker. They'll require that the connections have a current limiting impedance and be galvanically isolated from other circuits and of course, power.

For simple experiments, an isolated laptop is your best friend. Operating it from the battery with no external connections (i.e. Ethernet line, USB devices, etc...) allows you to have a power source (via USB) and signal processor. It's best to clear it of all possible connections to ensure that no one is tempted to charge it etc...
 
Please also review UL544 for this project. As mentioned, you will need to get safety approvals if you want to actually attach this to any person. Even if this is a simulation-only project, you need to research the safety considerations (and immunity issues that Jim brings up), in order to write a complete project report.
 
In addition to what has already been said, I'd like to suggest that you provide substantial notch filtering, bandpass limiting and transient protection to your input lines and amplifiers. Touch the probe of an oscilloscope to see how high an induced power line voltage could be on the input leads. This could easily drive your amps to either rail preventing amplification of the signal.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top