Integral from -pi/3 to 0 of 3sin^3(x)dx ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lo.Lee.Ta.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Lo.Lee.Ta.
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
∫from -\pi/3 to 0 of 3sec3xdx

Integration by parts...

3∫sec2x*secxdx

dv= 3sec2x
v= 3tanx

u= secx
du= secxtanx

Formula: uv - ∫vdu

secx*3tanx - ∫3tanx*secxtanxdx

Integration by parts again...

u= 3tanx
du= 3sec2x

dv= sextanx
v= secx

3tanx*secx - ∫secx*3sec2x

Altogether:

∫3sec3x = 3secxtanx - 3secxtanx - ∫3sec3x

*Add ∫3sec3x on both sides*

∫2*3sec3x = 0 !

It seems that the two 3secxtanx's would cancel! :/

∫6sec3x = 0

This is like the same thing we started out with! :confused: ugh, man. I don't really know what to do now.
I know this is a definite integral, so we should substitute -pi/3 and 0 in the end, but we still have an integral! #=_=

...This definitely does not seem right! :(
But I don't really see what's wrong with my work.
Please help! Thank you so much! :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lo.Lee.Ta. said:
∫from -\pi/3 to 0 of 3sec3xdx

Integration by parts...

3∫sec2x*secxdx

dv= 3sec2x
v= 3tanx

u= secx
du= secxtanx

Formula: uv - ∫vdu

secx*3tanx - ∫3tanx*secxtanxdx

Integration by parts again...
That's not the way to go. Your integral above can be written as
## \int tan^2(x) sec(x) dx##
## = \int (sec^2(x) - 1) sec(x) dx ##
This will give you another sec3 integral and one that's somewhat easier. You should be able to solve algebraically for the integral you're looking for.
I am not including the factor of 3 from the first integral. It would have been better to bring it out of the integral right away and just concentrate on ∫sec3(x) dx.
Lo.Lee.Ta. said:
u= 3tanx
du= 3sec2x

dv= sextanx
v= secx

3tanx*secx - ∫secx*3sec2x

Altogether:

∫3sec3x = 3secxtanx - 3secxtanx - ∫3sec3x

*Add ∫3sec3x on both sides*

∫2*3sec3x = 0 !

It seems that the two 3secxtanx's would cancel! :/

∫6sec3x = 0

This is like the same thing we started out with! :confused: ugh, man. I don't really know what to do now.
I know this is a definite integral, so we should substitute -pi/3 and 0 in the end, but we still have an integral! #=_=

...This definitely does not seem right! :(
But I don't really see what's wrong with my work.
Please help! Thank you so much! :D
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top