Integral of (Force * Velocity).

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the integral of the product of force and velocity for a particle moving in the x-y plane, where the force is proportional to the velocity. The velocity components are given as x = 64√3t and y = 64t - 16t², leading to the expression for velocity V. Participants express confusion about determining the force F, suggesting it could be represented as F = (64a√3t)i + (64at - 16at²)j for some constant a. The integral of the dot product of F and V is computed, yielding a result that raises questions about the physical interpretation of force being proportional to velocity, particularly in relation to work done. The integral signifies the work done by the force over the distance traveled by the particle.
Skatch
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moves in the x-y plane having the components of its velocity to be:

x = 64\sqrt{3}t and y = 64t - 16t^2,

and a force acting on this particle is proportional to its velocity. Find:

\int(F \cdot V)dt

from t = 0 to t = 4. Give a physical meaning to your result.



Homework Equations



Not sure.



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having a hard time getting started here, because I don't know what F is. I've got:

V = (64\sqrt{3}t)i + (64t - 16t^2)j,

right? But I don't know what to dot it with inside the integral. I'm not looking for a total solution here, I'm just wondering if someone can quickly tell me what exactly F is. I should be ok from there.

If F is proportional to V, do I just set

F = (64a\sqrt{3}t)i + (64at - 16at^2)j

for some unknown constant a?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So, if I set F equal to what I stated above, I get an answer of:

\int( F \cdot V ) dt = \int(16384 a t^2 - 2048 a t^3 + 256 a t^4)dt = (4063232 a)/15

I don't even know what to make of that...
 
Last edited:
Why would the force be proportional to the velocity?
You know (I hope) that F=m*a.
And acceleration is the derivative of velocity, isn't it?

The significance of the integral... v*dt is ds (distance). Force time distance = ?
 
nasu said:
Why would the force be proportional to the velocity?
You know (I hope) that F=m*a.
And acceleration is the derivative of velocity, isn't it?

The significance of the integral... v*dt is ds (distance). Force times distance = ?

Force times Distance equals Work
 
nasu said:
Why would the force be proportional to the velocity?
Because it's a given in the problem.
You know (I hope) that F=m*a.
And acceleration is the derivative of velocity, isn't it?

The significance of the integral... v*dt is ds (distance). Force time distance = ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top