Integral of G(x,y): dx vs. dy vs. ds

  • Thread starter Thread starter LinearAlgebra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx Integral
LinearAlgebra
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
If you have a curve integral, what is the conceptual or physical difference between integrating G(x,y)dx, G(x,y)dy and G(x,y)ds ?? How do you know when to do either one??

Confused. :shy:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
LinearAlgebra said:
If you have a curve integral, what is the conceptual or physical difference between integrating G(x,y)dx, G(x,y)dy and G(x,y)ds ?? How do you know when to do either one??

Confused. :shy:

You sound like you might be asking what the physical interpretations of these various line integrals are. The last one, G(x,y)ds, is called the line integral with respect to arc length. In single variable calculus, we say that if f(x) is positive, then the definite integral of f(x) over [a,b] represents the area under the graph of f(x) from a to b. In multivariable calculus, imagine graphing G(x,y) in an xyz space, and imagine the path C on the xy plane. We say that if G(x,y) is positive along path C, then the line integral of G(x,y)ds represents the area of the "curtain" that falls from G(x,y) down to path C on the xy plane.

There isn't any obvious physical description of the line integrals of G(x,y) with respect to x or y (not one that I can think of, anyway). But I can say this much. The differential dx represents a change from (x,y) to a new point, in the x direction, and dy represents an analogous small change in the y direction. The differential ds represents a change beginning at some point (x,y) and ending at another point, moving along curve C.

Computationally, these line integrals are very simple. If curve C can be parametrized according to two functions x(t) and y(t), then just rewrite the integrands like this:

G(x(t),y(t))\frac{dx}{dt}dt

G(x(t),y(t))\frac{dy}{dt}dt

G(x(t),y(t))\sqrt{(\dfrac{dx}{dt})^{2}+(\frac{dy}{dt})^{2}}

And that's how you do line integrals.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top