I've been reading Mechanics of Landau Lifgarbagez. They state that "not all integrals of motion are of equal importance", and that "there are some whose constancy is of profound importance"...these ones are conserved for the motion.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What confuses me is that I thought that's what an integral of the motion was!! A function of the phase space coordinates that was conserved for the motion! What i seeem to be reading is that integrals of motion are conserved, but some are more important because they are conserved???? Can someone clarify this?

On a similar point, for a single free particle with (2s - 1) = 5 integrals of motion, with s being the degrees of freedom, what are its integrals of motion? I would reason them as:

1) Linear momentum in x direction.

2) As above for y.

3) As above for z.

4) Total energy.

5) Angular momentum.

If that is the case, the howcome the angular momentum only takes one integral of motion? Surely the angular momentum vector can be expressed in terms of its x,y and z components?

Edit: I think i just solved the last part for myself....only the TOTAL angular momentum is conserved..unlike linear, where its individual components are each conserved...is that correct?

Any input helping to clear this up for me is highly appreciated!!

Thanks!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Integrals of motion some more important than others?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**